1979
DOI: 10.1021/j100485a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate constant for the reaction atomic hydrogen + nitrogen dioxide from 195 to 400 K with FP-RF and DF-RF techniques

Abstract: Publication costs assisted by NASA Absolute rate constants for the reaction of atomic hydrogen with nitrogen dioxide have been measured over the temperature range 195-400 K with two independent techniques both of which utilize resonance fluorescence detection of H. The reaction was studied from 230 to 400 K with the flash photolysis-resonance fluorescence (FP-RF) technique. No variation with temperature was observed, the best representation for the rate constant being (1.32 ± 0.12) X 10-10 cm3 molecule-1 s-1.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature data for k 1 and k 2 are given in Table III, together with the latest evaluations of the NASA and IUPAC panels and our current recommendation. In arriving at a recommendation for k 1 we reduced the weighting of the original absolute study by Michael et al [14], which lies considerably above the mean of the other values, and that of Wallington et al [17] which is not thought to be as reliable as the present study. Several of the studies [16,20] were not explicitly designed to measure k 1 and these studies have been given weights of 0.5 in the analysis, as has the study by Lightfoot et al [18] [17,21 -24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature data for k 1 and k 2 are given in Table III, together with the latest evaluations of the NASA and IUPAC panels and our current recommendation. In arriving at a recommendation for k 1 we reduced the weighting of the original absolute study by Michael et al [14], which lies considerably above the mean of the other values, and that of Wallington et al [17] which is not thought to be as reliable as the present study. Several of the studies [16,20] were not explicitly designed to measure k 1 and these studies have been given weights of 0.5 in the analysis, as has the study by Lightfoot et al [18] [17,21 -24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The current study shows that the value of k 2 should be increased by about 5%, while the uncertainty can now be considered to be 15 -20%. Neither k 1 nor k 2 is expected to depend on temperature [14,18,23]. A general observation from this work is that measurement of the rate coefficients for even the simplest oxygenated organics is not straightforward, and the reactions should be studied by more than one technique whenever possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The model is supplemented by the H+NO 2 rate constant, 1.3×10 −10 cm 3 s −1 (Wagner and Welzbacher, 1976;Michael et al, 1979), plus an H-atom diffusion term, and the triexponential solution is used in the analysis. Note that in the case of NO 2 as scavenger, coefficient a contains a term proportional to [NO 2 ].…”
Section: Aromatic -Oh + Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only absolute measurements reported so far were those of Michael et al [12] and Park et al [13] for the reaction of Cl with CH 3 OCH 3 , using FP-RF and DF-MS, respectively. The other measurements were performed using the relative rate technique.…”
Section: ϫ3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for DME, all reported data so far on the reactions of Cl with these ethers have been performed using the relative rate technique [7 -11]. The absolute studies for the reaction of Cl with DME were performed by Michael et al [12] and Park et al [13] using the flash photolysis -fluorescence resonance (FP-FR) and discharge flow-mass spectrometry (DF-MS) techniques, respectively. To our knowledge, no data exist on the reaction of Cl with CH 3 CH 2 OC(CH 3 ) 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%