1989
DOI: 10.1021/j100340a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate constants for hydrogen atom + oxygen + M from 298 to 639 K for M = helium nitrogen and water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the exception of the value for h 5 ,~2 , all those rate constants were taken from the literature without adjustment. The value of h 5 , N Z which was used to generate the predictions was [8,11,14,15,201 is not important because the low concentration of this species (mole fraction <0.008) makes the calculations insensitive to this value. Figure 5 shows and, as shown in Figure 5, there are regions where the predictions are substantially independent of k35.…”
Section: Time (S)supporting
confidence: 86%
“…With the exception of the value for h 5 ,~2 , all those rate constants were taken from the literature without adjustment. The value of h 5 , N Z which was used to generate the predictions was [8,11,14,15,201 is not important because the low concentration of this species (mole fraction <0.008) makes the calculations insensitive to this value. Figure 5 shows and, as shown in Figure 5, there are regions where the predictions are substantially independent of k35.…”
Section: Time (S)supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results from these calculations are included in Figure 1. Ascanbeseen,theCAS+1+2modelpredictedaBorn-Oppenheimer barrier to reaction of about 0.1 kcal mol -1 relative to the energy 82 Bates et al, 7 Baulch et al, 9 Carleton et al, 83 Cobos et al, 6 Davidson et al, 84 Hanning-Lee et al, 85 Hsu et al, 86 Michael et al, 18 and Mueller et al 87 of the reactants, which obviously is not correct. The situation improved when the Davidson correction was included, but still, the calculation predicted a small barrier to reaction below the energy of the reactants.…”
Section: Master Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plotted low-pressure and highpressure limiting rate coefficients are the values preferred by the IUPAC panel. 9 References: Baulch et al, 9 Carleton et al, 83 Cobos et al, 6 Hahn et al, 8 Hsu et al, 86 Kurylo, 88 Michael et al, 18 and Wong and Davis. 89 as bath gases, respectively.…”
Section: Master Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near the second explosion limit, R2 is favoured over R1 by higher pressures, which reduces the overall oxidation reactivity and leading to the well-known negative pressure dependence [3,5]. However, whilst the rate of R1 is well characterized [6,7], the rate of R2 is more uncertain [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Total: 6183 (Words) Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%