2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4601(200102)33:2<142::aid-kin1007>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate constants for the gas-phase reactions of OH radicals with a series of unsaturated alcohols

Abstract: Using a relative rate method, rate constants for the gas‐phase reactions of OH radicals with allyl alcohol, 3‐buten‐1‐ol, 3‐buten‐2‐ol, and 2‐methyl‐3‐buten‐2‐ol have been measured at 296 ± 2 K and atmospheric pressure of air. Using 1,3,5‐trimethylbenzene as the reference compound, the rate constants (in units of 10−11 cm3 molecule−1 s−1) were: allyl alcohol, 5.46 ± 0.35; 3‐buten‐1‐ol, 5.50 ± 0.20; 3‐buten‐2‐ol, 5.93 ± 0.23; and 2‐methyl‐3‐buten‐2‐ol, 5.67 ± 0.13; where the indicated errors are two least‐squar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
69
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
13
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2) exhibits a very fast decay consistent with a reaction rate coefficient with OH similar to isoprene (1.0−1.2×10 −10 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 ). This estimate is consistent with the fastest rate recently derived by Baker et al (2005) and ∼80% greater than the SAR estimate (k SAR OH =6.82×10 −11 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 or 7.9×10 −11 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 with the correction from Bethel et al, 2001;Papagni et al, 2001) . This discrepancy can be partly explained by the effect of the alcohol group α of the double bond which enhances the addition of OH (Papagni et al, 2001).…”
Section: Consequencessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2) exhibits a very fast decay consistent with a reaction rate coefficient with OH similar to isoprene (1.0−1.2×10 −10 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 ). This estimate is consistent with the fastest rate recently derived by Baker et al (2005) and ∼80% greater than the SAR estimate (k SAR OH =6.82×10 −11 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 or 7.9×10 −11 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 with the correction from Bethel et al, 2001;Papagni et al, 2001) . This discrepancy can be partly explained by the effect of the alcohol group α of the double bond which enhances the addition of OH (Papagni et al, 2001).…”
Section: Consequencessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The CH 2 CH 2 OH radical may decompose thermally, react with the O/H radical pool, or with stable species such as O 2 . The rates for reactions of unsaturated alcohols with a CH 2 =CHROH structure are generally somewhat faster than those of the corresponding alkenes [30], indicating that the ROH substituent activates the C=C bond [30,50,51]. However, the difference in rates are roughly within a factor of two at 298 K. By analogy with oxidation of C 2 H 5 under similar conditions [19], we would expect the reaction with O 2 to be the major consumption step for CH 2 CH 2 OH.…”
Section: Detailed Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 where the best fit “alkane” and “alkene” lines from the literature 16 are displayed. Included are some data for alcohols and esters that formally react through hydrogen atom abstraction 42–44. The deviation from the “abstraction” line is clear and in some cases systematic, just as in the aldehyde case 21.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Plot of log( k OH) vs. log( k NO 3 ) adapted from 19. In addition, open circles represent data for aldehyde from this work and 20, open triangles represent unsaturated alcohols from 32, 42, filled triangles represent saturated alcohols from 16, and crosses represent ethers from 43, 44. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%