“…However, the PCC operational configuration may not be an economically viable or easy-toimplement mode of operation because (i) the length of the column segments would have to be cut to a very specific tolerance requiring the construction of each PCC column system to be unique, (ii) the length of the column segments would have to change as the flow-rate of the liquid phase changes, which implies that a PCC column system to exploit the overshoot phenomenon would only be able to accommodate one flow-rate, (iii) the dynamics of the system would change as the particle diameter changes and, therefore, the lengths of the column segments would have to change as the particle diameter changes, which implies that a PCC column system to exploit the overshoot phenomenon would only be able to accommodate one particle diameter, and (iv) the dynamics of the system would be very difficult to control. As an alternative to the PCC mode of operation, one could exploit the overshoot in the concentration of the adsorbate in the adsorbed phase by employing a radial flow [26] column (RFC) where the feed stream passes through the outer surface of the column and flows along the radius of the column toward the center, while the effluent stream exits the column through a thin annulus at the center of the column. The flow could also pass from the inner annulus to the outer surface of the column as well; of course, a series of simulations should be performed in order to determine the best direction for the flow in the RFC but, as an initial estimate, due to the fact that a significant portion of the particles are located near the outer surface of the RFC, the overshoot in the concentration of the adsorbate in the adsorbed phase could be better developed in the particles located near the outer surface of the column when the feed stream passes from the outer surface of the column to the inner annulus.…”