1996
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1996)122:10(939)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate Dependent Damage Model for Concrete in Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
78
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth of D c and D t is defined by the following equations which are similar to the equations used by Dube et al [11]:…”
Section: Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The growth of D c and D t is defined by the following equations which are similar to the equations used by Dube et al [11]:…”
Section: Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Microcracking is captured with a rate dependent damage model [11], which uses two damage variables in order to provide a realistic response of the material in uniaxial compression while preserving a good description of tension, which is a characteristic of damage models. Rate effects are necessary in order to represent dynamic experiments (mostly dynamic tensile tests).…”
Section: Constitutive Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, a viscous-damage formulation, similar to a Perzyna-type of viscoplasticity, was used to describe the rate of damage (see for example [29][30][31]). Plotzitza et al [25] proposed a formulation where the evolution of damage depends to some extent on the immediately preceding strain history.…”
Section: Rate-dependent Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding constitutive models, even with induced anisotropy, are now most often implemented with localization limiters, i.e. either in a nonlocal form [1,2] or as visco-damage models [3,4,5] or both [6,7]. This allows to gain some numerical robustness as mesh independency of the converged finite element solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%