1972
DOI: 10.1039/c39720000570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-determining proton transfer in intramolecular catalysis of amide hydrolysis by the carboxylic acid group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under acidic pH, as observed for 22 , both compounds formed the cyanohydrin adducts 27 and 31 respectively, but no hydrolysis of these adducts were observed even after 3–5 days (Supporting Information Figure S32). On the other hand, when the reactions were repeated at pH 7.5–8.0, cyanohydrin adduct 27 , which has a 1,5‐relationship, was not only found to hydrolyze to the corresponding α‐hydroxy amide 29 (2 days, Figure ) but further converted cleanly to the corresponding α‐hydroxy acid (Supporting Information Figures S33–S35), which is consistent with anchimeric assisted hydrolysis of the amide as reported by Kirby . However, cyanohydrin adduct 31 , which has a 1,6‐relationship, was found to persist (Figure ) over days with no further hydrolysis (Figures S36–S37); at pH 13, the formation of the cyanohydrin adduct itself was not observed (Supporting Information Figure S38).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Under acidic pH, as observed for 22 , both compounds formed the cyanohydrin adducts 27 and 31 respectively, but no hydrolysis of these adducts were observed even after 3–5 days (Supporting Information Figure S32). On the other hand, when the reactions were repeated at pH 7.5–8.0, cyanohydrin adduct 27 , which has a 1,5‐relationship, was not only found to hydrolyze to the corresponding α‐hydroxy amide 29 (2 days, Figure ) but further converted cleanly to the corresponding α‐hydroxy acid (Supporting Information Figures S33–S35), which is consistent with anchimeric assisted hydrolysis of the amide as reported by Kirby . However, cyanohydrin adduct 31 , which has a 1,6‐relationship, was found to persist (Figure ) over days with no further hydrolysis (Figures S36–S37); at pH 13, the formation of the cyanohydrin adduct itself was not observed (Supporting Information Figure S38).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In more concentrated acid, where the starting amide is largely protonated, eq 7 reduces to eq 11. kKx{H+)(H2Q)"72 73 A2(H+)/A3 71 72 , _ fcA,A3(FI20)"73 Aobsd--"--A2 71 (11) (12) Equation 12 suggests that in stronger acid, as A becomes protonated, the reaction rate will become independent of the acidity of the solution (if 73/71 does not change significantly).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 However, in the case of the maleamic acid substitution being an isopropyl group, the proton transfer process was found to become the rate-determining step, leading to strong general-acid catalysis. 57 (70% Dox release at pH 6.0 vs. 10% release at pH 7.0 at 5 h). This selectivity is higher than the previously discussed spiro diorthoester linker with the pH 6/7 cleavage ratio being around 4 at 5 h. This advantage reaffirms why the old maleamic acid linker strategy is still being actively studied in the field.…”
Section: Maleic Acid-derived Linkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate‐limiting step for the hydrolysis was confirmed to be the breakdown of 30 56 . However, in the case of the maleamic acid substitution being an isopropyl group, the proton transfer process was found to become the rate‐determining step, leading to strong general‐acid catalysis 57 . There have not been thorough studies as to whether the reaction is under kinetic or thermodynamic control.…”
Section: Ph‐sensitive Linkersmentioning
confidence: 99%