2016
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2016.2586919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-Distortion Function for a Heegard-Berger Problem With Two Sources and Degraded Reconstruction Sets

Abstract: In this work, we investigate an instance of the Heegard-Berger problem with two sources and arbitrarily correlated side information sequences at two decoders, in which the reconstruction sets at the decoders are degraded. Specifically, two sources are to be encoded in a manner that one of the two is reproduced losslessly by both decoders, and the other is reproduced to within some prescribed distortion level at one of the two decoders. We establish a single-letter characterization of the rate-distortion functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the proof of achievability, it combines the optimal coding scheme of the Heegard–Berger problem with degraded reconstruction sets [ 9 ] and the double-binning based scheme of Shayevitz and Wigger (Theorem 2, [ 4 ]) for the Gray–Wyner problem with side information, and is outlined in the following.…”
Section: Gray–wyner Model With Side Information and Degraded Reconmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the proof of achievability, it combines the optimal coding scheme of the Heegard–Berger problem with degraded reconstruction sets [ 9 ] and the double-binning based scheme of Shayevitz and Wigger (Theorem 2, [ 4 ]) for the Gray–Wyner problem with side information, and is outlined in the following.…”
Section: Gray–wyner Model With Side Information and Degraded Reconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gray–Wyner model with side information generalizes another long standing open source coding problem, the famous Heegard–Berger problem [ 2 ]. Full single-letter characterization of the optimal rate-distortion function of the Heegard–Berger problem is known only in few specific cases, the most important of which are the cases of : (i) stochastically degraded side information sequences [ 2 ] (see also [ 5 ]); (ii) Sgarro’s result [ 6 ] on the corresponding lossless problem; (iii) Gaussian sources with quadratic distortion measure [ 3 , 7 ]; (iv) some instances of conditionally less-noisy side information sequences [ 8 ]; and (v) the recently solved HB model with general side information sequences and degraded reconstruction sets [ 9 ], i.e., the model of Figure 2 with — in the lossless case, a few other optimal results were shown, such as for the so-called complementary delivery [ 10 ]. A lower bound for general instances of the rate distortion problem with side information at multiple decoders, which is inspired by a linear-programming lower bound for index coding, has been developed recently by Unal and Wagner in [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rate-distortion function has been determined in several special cases, including when the side information at the various decoders can be ordered according to stochastic degradedness [3], when there are two decoders whose side information is "mismatch degraded" [4], and when there are two decoders and the side information at decoder 2 is "conditionally less noisy" than the side information at decoder 1 and decoder 1 seeks to losslessly reproduce a deterministic function of the source [5]. Also, instead of imposing some degraded structure on the side information, one can consider degraded reconstruction sets at the two decoders in which one component of the source is reconstructed at both decoders with vanishing block error probability and the other component of the source is only reconstructed at a single decoder [6]. Various vector Gaussian instances of the problem are solved [7], [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although X is a vector, we can view it as an ordered set which also induces an ordered set structure on the subsets. Hence, we can use the set notation whenever it is convenient 6. The statement of the result in[10] does not contain the (monotonicity) condition, although it is clear from the proof that it was intended to be included.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation