1969
DOI: 10.3758/bf03336227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of concept identification and the noticeability of the relevant dimension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a repetition of the initial analysis after a square root transformation of the original data yielded similar outcomes. Leonard (1969) and Downing (1969). Stimulus set and dimensional preference were ignored in further analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a repetition of the initial analysis after a square root transformation of the original data yielded similar outcomes. Leonard (1969) and Downing (1969). Stimulus set and dimensional preference were ignored in further analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%