2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of droplet deposition in steam–water annular flow and effect of a flow obstacle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is considered that the droplets entrainment is composed of two different mechanisms of droplets formation: the wave entrainment (m ew ) and the boiling entrainment (m eb ). The wave entrainment rate caused by breakup of disturbance wave can be evaluated by the equations given by Okawa et al 12 m ew = r l min k e1 p e1 k e2 p 0:5 e1 k e3…”
Section: Closed Equations Of Annular Flow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is considered that the droplets entrainment is composed of two different mechanisms of droplets formation: the wave entrainment (m ew ) and the boiling entrainment (m eb ). The wave entrainment rate caused by breakup of disturbance wave can be evaluated by the equations given by Okawa et al 12 m ew = r l min k e1 p e1 k e2 p 0:5 e1 k e3…”
Section: Closed Equations Of Annular Flow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holowach et al 11 developed an upward co-current annular flow model based on a force balance and stability analysis and predicted the liquid droplet entrainment rate of annular flow region. Okawa et al 12 measured deposition rate of droplets in vapor-water annular two-phase flow in a 5mm-diameter vertical circular tube and presented the correlations for liquid droplet deposition rate. The mechanism of entrainment and deposition of annular flow is analyzed based on different assumptions and research methods, and the correlations for droplet entrainment rate and droplet deposition rate under different conditions are given by Ueda et al, 13 Okawa and Kataoka, 14 Schubring and Shedd, 15 Paleev and Filippovich, 16 Kataoka et al, 17 and Hewitt and Govan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%