2000
DOI: 10.1002/1096-9837(200008)25:8<895::aid-esp109>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of sedimentation in Lake Kinneret, Israel: spatial and temporal variations

Abstract: The rate of sedimentation in Lake Kinneret was measured over several years by means of sediment traps, in up to seven different locations in the lake. Gross sedimentation rates measured in the sediment traps vary from about 1·5 kg m−2 a−1 in the deepest part of the lake up to 10 kg m−2 a−1 near the mouth of the upper Jordan river. The rate of sedimentation near the Jordan's inflow is highly correlated to flow discharge in the river, while in the centre of the lake the seasonal sedimentation pattern is mainly c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This remains speculative in the absence of additional observations. Although the sediment trap method is useful for determining bulk sedimentation rates (Håkanson and Jansson, 1983;Koren and Klein, 2000;Gilbert and Butler, 2004) with the limitation that the timing of deposition is not identified (Lamoureux, 2005). Here, the combined use of in situ profiling of the water column and varved sediment permits linkages to be drawn between the particle size distribution and concentration of sediment in suspension, the size distribution of bottom sediment, and the timing of deposition.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This remains speculative in the absence of additional observations. Although the sediment trap method is useful for determining bulk sedimentation rates (Håkanson and Jansson, 1983;Koren and Klein, 2000;Gilbert and Butler, 2004) with the limitation that the timing of deposition is not identified (Lamoureux, 2005). Here, the combined use of in situ profiling of the water column and varved sediment permits linkages to be drawn between the particle size distribution and concentration of sediment in suspension, the size distribution of bottom sediment, and the timing of deposition.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that this event does not represent the long‐term deposition rate. Assuming an accumulation rate of 1–4 mm/yr (Koren and Klein, ), construction may have taken place between two and 12 millennia ago.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trap consisted of four PVC tubes, 10 cm in diameter and 60 cm long. A bottle was screwed to the bottom of each tube to collect the settling sediment (Koren & Klein, ). Sediment traps were replaced every 21–30 days by a diver.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%