2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of tympanic membrane perforation after intratympanic steroid injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is associated with a risk of persistent tympanic membrane perforation, although no perforation of the tympanic membrane was found in any of our animals at 4 weeks after exposure to USMB. A rate of 1.6% was reported for persistent perforation of the tympanic membrane following multiple intratympanic steroid injections (37). Modifying the USMB cavitation settings to reduce the number of the injections may avoid this complication and is another important issue to investigate further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is associated with a risk of persistent tympanic membrane perforation, although no perforation of the tympanic membrane was found in any of our animals at 4 weeks after exposure to USMB. A rate of 1.6% was reported for persistent perforation of the tympanic membrane following multiple intratympanic steroid injections (37). Modifying the USMB cavitation settings to reduce the number of the injections may avoid this complication and is another important issue to investigate further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our lack of TM complications or permanent injury with IT injection was consistent with reports in the literature describing its relative safety. 45 However, because multiple IT injections do add theoretical risk to TM injury and may subsequently impact low-frequency PTA, [46][47][48] the investigation of novel treatments that may decrease the number of necessary IT injections, such as the described migraine prophylactic medications, is important. The lack of TM complications following IT injections in our studied cohort can be attributed to: 1) application of a very small amount of phenol (approximately the size of a 25 Ga needle) on the TM to minimize the chance of Laryngoscope 00: 2020…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common complication of ITS treatment is persistent tympanic membrane perforation. [21] Among our patients, none had tympanic membrane perforation. In addition, other possible complications such as vertigo, otitis media, and intolerable pain were not observed in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%