1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00966738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of uniform convergence of statistical estimators of spectral density in spaces of differentiable functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A prototypical assumption of this kind could, e.g., limit the magnitude of the derivative of f in a neighborhood of zero uniformly over . That is, one could require the existence of a finite constant M and a positive such that f ≤ M for all < and all f ∈ Indeed, under this type of assumption on the class , convergence to zero of the minimax risk for estimating f 0 and rates of convergence have been established; see Samarov (1977), Farrell (1979), and Bentkus (1985). Although assumptions on like the one just given seem to be indispensable if one wants to establish convergence of the minimax risk to zero, Theorem 4.1 demonstrates that such assumptions are less than innocuous as they exclude standard classes of spectral densities like AR MA ARMA , and ARMA r s r ≥ 1 s ≥ 1.…”
Section: Lower Risk Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A prototypical assumption of this kind could, e.g., limit the magnitude of the derivative of f in a neighborhood of zero uniformly over . That is, one could require the existence of a finite constant M and a positive such that f ≤ M for all < and all f ∈ Indeed, under this type of assumption on the class , convergence to zero of the minimax risk for estimating f 0 and rates of convergence have been established; see Samarov (1977), Farrell (1979), and Bentkus (1985). Although assumptions on like the one just given seem to be indispensable if one wants to establish convergence of the minimax risk to zero, Theorem 4.1 demonstrates that such assumptions are less than innocuous as they exclude standard classes of spectral densities like AR MA ARMA , and ARMA r s r ≥ 1 s ≥ 1.…”
Section: Lower Risk Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results can be given for regression or density function estimation. We note that there is a growing number of papers abandoning the "pointwise" approach in favor of a minimax point of view, e.g., Samarov (1977), Farrell (1979), Ibragimov andKhashminskii (1980, 1981), Stone (1982), Bentkus (1985), Efroimovich and Pinsker (1986), Donoho and Johnston (1994), Donoho et al (1995), Lepski and Spokoiny (1997), to mention a few. The typical approach in these papers is to restrict the set sufficiently such as to rule out the discontinuity of the map h .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3.1. It is known from Bentkus (1985) that the minimax risk over some Besov ball f f aj f j â,2 < Rg cannot be smaller than C9R 2a(12â) n À2âa(2â1) , where C9 is some positive constant, and therefore our estimator is minimax (up to constants) over all such balls simultaneously.…”
Section: Adaptation To Unknown Smoothnessmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the nonparametric framework, Bentkus and Rudzkis (1976) proved large-deviation results for a projection spectral estimate based on a tapered periodogram. Bentkus (1985) computed optimal rates of convergence of spectral estimates in some spaces of differentiable functions. In both cases, the variables are Gaussian but the rates of convergence are asymptotic and the methods are not adaptive: this means that the de®nition of their estimator requires a priori knowledge of the smoothness of the function f .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essa taxa de convergência é um pouco mais lenta do que se os erros fossem i.i.d. onde, em tal caso, o melhor estimador linear de ondaletas é ótimo do ponto de vista da taxa de convergência minimax (BIERENS, 1983;BENTKUS, 1985). Note que a taxa de convergência do melhor estimador linear reside entre aqueles estimadores citados no Teorema 5.…”
Section: Melhor Estimador Linearunclassified