1982
DOI: 10.1029/jb087ib12p10009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of wind abrasion on Mars

Abstract: Estimation of the rate of aeolian abrasion of rocks on Mars requires knowledge of (1) particle flux, (2) susceptibilities to abrasion of various rocks, and (3) wind frequencies on Mars. Fluxes and susceptibilities for a wide range of conditions were obtained in the laboratory and combined with wind data from the Viking meteorology experiment. Assuming an abundant supply of sand‐sized particles, estimated rates range up to 2.1×10−2 cm of abrasion per year in the vicinity of Viking Lander 1. This rate is orders … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1H) is a light-toned, flat rock with ventifact grooves cut into the upper surface. We suggest that the prominent grooves resulted from the trajectories of abrading particles that struck the rock at low angles, gouging the surface, an interpretation consistent with laboratory experiments of rock abrasion under martian conditions (31,32).…”
Section: S P I R I T a T G U S E V C R A T E Rsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…1H) is a light-toned, flat rock with ventifact grooves cut into the upper surface. We suggest that the prominent grooves resulted from the trajectories of abrading particles that struck the rock at low angles, gouging the surface, an interpretation consistent with laboratory experiments of rock abrasion under martian conditions (31,32).…”
Section: S P I R I T a T G U S E V C R A T E Rsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The wind frequency at MPF could be lower than at VL1. The value of Zo for VL 1 was less than a centimeter [Sutton et al, 1978], which was deemed to have a negligible effect on [Greeley et al, 1982]. Compare this to MPF, where Zo = 2 cm and u,t increases substantially, thus requiring stronger winds averaged over the landing site area to move 100-1am sand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abrasion un-where q is the particle flux, fis the wind frequency, and S,, is the der current atmospheric conditions will likely result from parti-susceptibility to abrasion [Greeley et al, 1982] and R has units of cles with low saltation velocities. mass per area per unit time (e.g., g cm -2 s'•).…”
Section: Agents Of Abrasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lieu of that, following are some key topics in planetary aeolian studies to which he made significant contributions over the years: wind tunnel and laboratory experiments (Greeley et al, 1974(Greeley et al, , 1980(Greeley et al, , 1981(Greeley et al, , 1982(Greeley et al, , 1984a(Greeley et al, ,b, 2000b(Greeley et al, , 2003aGreeley and Iversen, 1985;Lorenz et al, 2005;Neakrase et al, 2006;Neakrase and Greeley, 2010); erosion and abrasion by wind-blown sand (Greeley et al, 1982;Greeley and Iversen, 1985;Bridges et al, 1999;Golombek et al, 2006;Thomson et al, 2008); particle motion induced by the wind White et al, 1976;Greeley et al, 1976Greeley et al, , 1980Greeley et al, , 1988Greeley andIversen, 1985, 1987;Greeley, 2002;Sullivan et al, 2008); dust mobilization and dust devils (Greeley et al, 1981(Greeley et al, , 2000b(Greeley et al, , 2003a(Greeley et al, , 2004b(Greeley et al, , 2006bGreeley and Iversen, 1985;Greeley and Williams, 1994;Greeley, 2002;Neakrase et al, 2006;Stanzel et al, 2008;Neakrase and Greeley, 2010); field investigations of aeolian sites (Greeley andIversen, 1985, 1987;Lancaster et al, 1987;…”
Section: Ronald Greeleymentioning
confidence: 99%