1992
DOI: 10.1109/23.211340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate prediction for single event effects-a critique

Abstract: The prediction of single event rates depends upon the proper interpretation of ground test data and upon the way the data is used in the rate calculations. This work performs a critical review of various methods used for heavy ion predictions and recommends a standard approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 also plots the heavy ion test results for the SRAM cells reported in [12] fabricated in 0.15 mm UNIBOND SOI process, together with the Weibull fit. The Weibull function is shown in [19]. The heavy ion test in [12] was carried out at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory using the 88 in.…”
Section: The Physical Basis For Predicting the Cross Section Of 6t Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 also plots the heavy ion test results for the SRAM cells reported in [12] fabricated in 0.15 mm UNIBOND SOI process, together with the Weibull fit. The Weibull function is shown in [19]. The heavy ion test in [12] was carried out at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory using the 88 in.…”
Section: The Physical Basis For Predicting the Cross Section Of 6t Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Author defined the mining operation and sensor data processing so that the distributed network processing and the technological improvement will be done. E. L. Petersen [9] presented a work on even specific handling on crique dataset under rate level analysis. Author processed the sample set for the estimation of rates and generates the critical information with low level prediction and recommendation based on standard information analysis.…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five general explanations have been proposed in the literature: 1) energy loss of the ion before arriving at the surface of the device, changing its LET [25], 2) the device has significant collection depth so that the cos(θ) correction to the cross section doesn't hold [33] Germanium introduced [12]. Introducing an alloy of SiGe in the base of a bipolar transistor provides a valence band offset in the base (Fig.…”
Section: Event Effect (See)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitive volume is used to determine how much energy is deposited from an ion event in a region of interest in a semiconductor device. The methods of obtaining the dimensions of the RPP have been refined and debated since its inception [25][26][27][28][29][30][31], but are typically defined by a combination of theory, technology process information, and experimental analysis. The charge collected from the energy deposited in the SV must be greater or equal to the critical charge of the device for a SEU to be recorded.…”
Section: Event Effect (See)mentioning
confidence: 99%