Raters Interpret Positively and Negatively Worded Items Similarly in a Quality of Life Instrument for Children

Abstract

Measurement invariance is an important assumption to meaningfully compare children’s quality of life (QoL) between different raters (eg, children and parents) and across genders. Moreover, QoL instruments may combine using negatively and positively worded items—a common method to reduce response bias. However, the wording effects may have different levels of impact on different raters and genders. Our aim was to investigate the measurement invariance of Kid-KINDL, a commonly used QoL instrument, across genders and raters and to consider the wording effects simultaneously. Third to sixth graders (208 boys and 235 girls) completed the self-rated Kid-KINDL, and 1 parent each of 241 children completed the parent-rated Kid-KINDL. The wording effects were accounted for by correlated traits-uncorrelated methods model. The measurement invariance was examined using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. Item loadings and item intercepts were invariant across gender and rater when we simultaneously accounted for the wording effects of Kid-KINDL. Our results suggest that Kid-KINDL could be used to compare QoL across gender and that parent-rated Kid-KINDL could be used to measure children’s QoL. Specifically, the invariant factor loadings across child-rated and parent-rated Kid-KINDL suggest that the score weights in each item were the same for both children and parents (ie, the important items identified by the children are the same items identified by the parents). The invariant item intercepts suggest that both children and parents share the same threshold for each item. Based on the results, we tentatively recommend that each score of a parent-rated Kid-KINDL can stand for each child’s QoL.

The relationship between children's overweight and quality of life: A comparison of Sizing Me Up, PedsQL and Kid-KINDL

“…Average scores were calculated for each domain score as well as the total score; therefore, the range of the Kid-KINDL domain and total scores was between 0 and 100. The construct validity, using confirmatory factor analysis of the Kid-KINDL Taiwan version, was supported (Lin et al, 2014, Lin et al, 2017). The internal consistency of the Kid-KINDL in the current study was .84.…”

Can We Apply WHOQOL-AGE to Asian Population? Verifying Its Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties in a Convenience Sample From Taiwan

“…Four sets of multigroup CFAs with nested models were applied to determine whether measurement invariance was supported across gender, educational level, setting, and age group. For each set of multigroup CFAs, there were three nested models, including a configural model, a model that constrained all the loadings to be equal between subgroups, and a model that constrained all the loadings and item intercepts to be equal between subgroups ( 22 , 23 ). The three nested models were then compared using the χ 2 difference test, the ΔCFI, and the ΔRMSEA.…”

Reliability and validity of the Thai pediatric quality of life inventory™ 3.0 neuromuscular module

“…For studies that assess children’s QoL through both children’s and parents’ perspectives, it is recommended to separate them. We do not let the parents and children to have interaction because parents may influence children’s answers [ 11 , 12 ]. If a child was unable to read, a research assistant read the questionnaire verbally and recorded the responses.…”