1996
DOI: 10.1002/1096-9098(199601)61:1<68::aid-jso2930610102>3.0.co;2-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of growth of human neoplasms: Part II

Abstract: Part I of this study [Spratt JS, Meyer JS, Spratt JA: J Surg Oncol 60:137-146, 1995] reviewed the early reports of investigators, predominantly mathematical biologists and statisticians considering the mathematical laws that would describe the growth of a neoplasm. Included were cytokinetic measurements of the mitotic index, thymidine labeling index, bromodeoxy-uridine labeling index, and the relation of these indices to the potential tumor volume doubling time. The actual doubling time of benign and malignant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
85
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The carrying capacity of the tumour is taken to be 10 6 cells per unit volume because a tumour nodule contains about 10 5 -10 9 tumour cells [54]. The tumour growth rate was taken to be 0.26 day −1 because several experimental tumour growth models estimate it to be in the range of 0.1-1 [5].…”
Section: Tumour Growth and Carrying Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carrying capacity of the tumour is taken to be 10 6 cells per unit volume because a tumour nodule contains about 10 5 -10 9 tumour cells [54]. The tumour growth rate was taken to be 0.26 day −1 because several experimental tumour growth models estimate it to be in the range of 0.1-1 [5].…”
Section: Tumour Growth and Carrying Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second visit dataset, total SLD is a sum of target lesions, 32 mm+25 mm equals to 57 mm of thickness. And for non-target lesion calculating the SLD is not possible due to its unequivocal increase (Lavin et al, 1980;Spratt et al, 1996). The actual SLD is difference of volumes between two lesion and percentage change (Lavin and Flowerdew, 1980).…”
Section: 2375 Volumetric Measurement In Oncology Imaging Trials For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the critical points in the discussed models rule out the possibility of tumor-load stabilization, which is sometimes observed experimentally [14,32,33]. Admittedly, cancer growth law is still a controversial phenomenon [6,21,26].…”
Section: The Function E(t) Decreases At the Beginning But The Same Imentioning
confidence: 99%