2015
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of inbreeding and genetic adaptation for populations managed as herds in zoos with a rotational mating system or with optimized contribution of parents

Abstract: This study compares two genetic management scenarios for species kept in herds, such as deer. The simulations were designed so that their results can be extended to a wide range of zoo populations. In the first scenario, the simulated populations of size 3 × 20, 6 × 40 or 20 × 60 (herds × animals in herd) were managed with a rotational mating (RM) scheme in which 10%, 20% or 50% of males were selected for breeding and moved between herds in a circular fashion. The second scenario was based on optimal contribut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if unknown parentage will continue to be perpetuated, a commitment to resolving future pedigrees will be necessary. If such a commitment is lacking, the most appropriate response might be to implement a less rigorous management strategy that does not rely on kinships (e.g., regular rotations to limit inbreeding; Crow & Kimura ; Princee ; Mucha & Komen ; Wright ) rather than investing in molecular work that will fail to have lasting impacts. That is not to say however, that some amount of ongoing molecular work is never warranted.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if unknown parentage will continue to be perpetuated, a commitment to resolving future pedigrees will be necessary. If such a commitment is lacking, the most appropriate response might be to implement a less rigorous management strategy that does not rely on kinships (e.g., regular rotations to limit inbreeding; Crow & Kimura ; Princee ; Mucha & Komen ; Wright ) rather than investing in molecular work that will fail to have lasting impacts. That is not to say however, that some amount of ongoing molecular work is never warranted.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular advantage of breeding circles is that they are relatively easy to implement. There is no need for a pedigree, the only important thing to know for each animal is the flock of birth (Mucha & Komen, ). Furthermore, each flock owner only needs to arrange exchange with its donor flock and its recipient flock, and the circle can be designed so that geographical distance between donor and recipient flocks is minimised (Windig & Kaal, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation program used here can be easily adapted for such a system of exchange. Further aspects that may be explored are combinations of breeding circles with other conservation schemes such as using semen stored in gene banks (Colleau & Avon, ) and optimal contribution schemes (Meuwissen, ; Mucha & Komen, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The similar technique is used in many situations nowadays (e.g. [9]). Suppose g i gametes are sampled from subpopulation i to obtain a hypothetical gamete pool with g T total gametes, so that the genetic contribution of subpopulation i is c i =g i /g T and…”
Section: Population Genetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%