1986
DOI: 10.1016/0379-7112(86)90032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of ‘production’ of hot gases in roof venting experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 also provides a good prediction of entrainment into plumes above the fire. This has observation has also been reported by Hinkley [22] using the model proposed by Thomas et al [8].…”
Section: Flame Entrainmentsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…1 also provides a good prediction of entrainment into plumes above the fire. This has observation has also been reported by Hinkley [22] using the model proposed by Thomas et al [8].…”
Section: Flame Entrainmentsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Given accurate information concerning the flow at the top of the flame, this location can be calculated; however, because this information is in general not available, correlations must be used. [17], Hinkley [9], and Delichatsios [20]. The primary results of four of these models or correlations for the prediction of the dependence of the plume mass flux on the height above the fire, Z, fire source diameter D or perimeter P, and heat release rate, Q, in the flame plume are summarized briefly below: [19] a Z 1.3Q 0.5 no dependence on burner diameter Delichatsios [20] several regimes no dependence on heat release…”
Section: Plume Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work has been reviewed recently in a more available form by Hinkley [9]. Plumes generated by room-scale fires produced by gas burners and wood cribs were placed beneath a hood-like ceiling with short vertical side walls.…”
Section: Hood Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…w(r,z) 0.01 (16) w(0, z) (17) To distinguish from the above, the mass flow rate calculated by the vertical velocity w as in equation (16) is relabeled as mlw : mlw = Jo-lOW" 2~rdr (18) Comparisons of numerical mass flow with those predicted by the empirical plume equations -Heskestad's equation [26' 31] , which is listed in NFPA 92B; Zukoski's equation, the equation due to McCaffrey and 'large fire' and 'small fire' plume equations due to Thomas [23], claiming that it is very satisfactory for heights up to 10 times the linear dimension (or diameter) of the fire, the results predicted by this equation are still higher than the results predicted by NFPA 92B or Zukoski's equation.…”
Section: / )mentioning
confidence: 99%