2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of rectal toxicity in patients treated with high dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy compared to dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it could be argued that HDR should result in an even more substantial reduction in the rate of rectal toxicity than proton therapy, and recently published retrospective evidence has suggested just that. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it could be argued that HDR should result in an even more substantial reduction in the rate of rectal toxicity than proton therapy, and recently published retrospective evidence has suggested just that. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature analysis clearly demonstrated that these differences transformed into important clinical consequences. For instance, it was shown that low and high dose rate brachytherapy was associated with significant reduction of grade III rectal toxicity when compared to external beam radiotherapy [ 4 , 20 , 21 ], SBRT [ 22 ] as monotherapy treatment and SBRT as a boost [ 18 , 23 ]. It is interesting that in all of these studies brachytherapy manifested by maximum grade II rectal toxicity that matches our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, grade III rectal late toxicity varied in most of these studies around 2.5%-5% [ 4 , 18 , 22 , 23 ]. Parzen et al [ 21 ] analyzed rectal toxicity in 2,863 patients with prostate cancer and mentioned that compared to external beam radiotherapy HDRB was associated with the decreased rates of chronic rectal grade ≥ II bleeding (1.3% vs. 8.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical significance was subsequently achieved for prostate cancer patients verified with cone beam Kv CT (CBKvCT) versus those verified with electronic portal devices (EPIDs) in the work of Conde-Moreno et al (20). The irreplaceability of a live IGRT lies in the demonstrated inadequacy of an off-line adaptive process used to define a PTV depending on variation in prostate position: indeed, Parzen et al found a significantly higher rate of rectal toxicity among patients treated with an Image-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy, compared to those treated with BT (21). The ultimate achievement of the IGRT potential derives from works such as those of D'Agostino et al (22), who published acceptable rectal toxicity rates (<20%) in patients with prostate cancer treated with ultrahyprofractionated VMAT and Real-time Electromagnetic Tracking.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%