2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2006.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of weak convergence of approximate minimum contrast estimators for the discretely observed Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 2.1 (a) is from Bishwal [2] and proof of (b) is elementary. Proof of the following lemma is also elementary.…”
Section: Given a Positive Integer M Construct A Probability Mass Funmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lemma 2.1 (a) is from Bishwal [2] and proof of (b) is elementary. Proof of the following lemma is also elementary.…”
Section: Given a Positive Integer M Construct A Probability Mass Funmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where p j , j ∈ {1, 2, · · · , m} is a probability mass function of a discrete random variable S on 0 ≤ s 1 < s 2 …”
Section: Discrete Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the papers [2] and [4] provided explicit upper bounds for the Kolmogorov distance for the rates of convergence of the distribution of θ n and θ n , respectively. On the other hand, [7] provided Wasserstein bounds in central limit theorem for θ n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%