2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.975290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rating the performance of a Brillouin distributed fiber sensor

Abstract: The effect of the characteristics of a generic distributed fiber sensor based on stimulated Brillouin scattering on the amplitude of the response is analyzed and a relation between the measurement noise on the time traces and the error on the determination of the Brillouin frequency shift is established. This makes possible to propose a simple figure-of-merit to fairly compare the performance of Brillouin distributed sensing systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard deviation of the obtained BFS between five consecutive traces at the very beginning of the fiber (first 5000 points window) is ∼0.618 MHz for both single sidebands acquisitions and ∼0.432 MHz for the balanced case. The standard deviation is improved by a factor of ∼ √ 2, in consistency with the SNR improvement expected in the balanced case (see [14] for details on the relationship between SNR and frequency estimation error). At the end of the fiber under test (last 5000 points window), the standard deviation for the single sideband cases is ∼1.232 MHz and, as expected, for the balanced detection case it is ∼0.884 MHz, also resulting in an improvement ratio of ∼ √ 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard deviation of the obtained BFS between five consecutive traces at the very beginning of the fiber (first 5000 points window) is ∼0.618 MHz for both single sidebands acquisitions and ∼0.432 MHz for the balanced case. The standard deviation is improved by a factor of ∼ √ 2, in consistency with the SNR improvement expected in the balanced case (see [14] for details on the relationship between SNR and frequency estimation error). At the end of the fiber under test (last 5000 points window), the standard deviation for the single sideband cases is ∼1.232 MHz and, as expected, for the balanced detection case it is ∼0.884 MHz, also resulting in an improvement ratio of ∼ √ 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…At the end of the fiber under test (last 5000 points window), the standard deviation for the single sideband cases is ∼1.232 MHz and, as expected, for the balanced detection case it is ∼0.884 MHz, also resulting in an improvement ratio of ∼ √ 2. In terms of the figure-of-merit discussed by [14], the FOM calculated at the end of the fiber is 25.28 for the single sideband detection cases, and raises up to 35.24 for the balanced detection case, confirming the ∼ √ 2 improvement factor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This is a direct consequence of the offbaseband detection at RF frequency. The Brillouin frequency shift along the fibre has been estimated by fitting a quadratic curve over the BGS [8] and is represented in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Experimental Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From that interaction, the power gained by the probe wave (from the pump wave), as represented in Fig.2, can be expressed as [6]:…”
Section: Conventional Botda Range Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%