2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44983-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratings-/Rankings-Based Versus Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis for Predicting Choices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their selection can be the choice of which alternative set that they prefer; this is called choice based conjoint analysis [17]. Alternatively, they may provide a measurement of the available alternatives; this is rate based or score based conjoint analysis [18,19]. In the early stage of conjoint analysis, there is no economic theory background [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their selection can be the choice of which alternative set that they prefer; this is called choice based conjoint analysis [17]. Alternatively, they may provide a measurement of the available alternatives; this is rate based or score based conjoint analysis [18,19]. In the early stage of conjoint analysis, there is no economic theory background [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, they may provide a measurement of the available alternatives; this is rate based or score based conjoint analysis [18,19]. In the early stage of conjoint analysis, there is no economic theory background [18]. The theoretical background of choice experiments is random utility models; the random utility model was developed by McFadden [20].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%