1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00757426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratio and group size in day care programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an extensive literature that has examined associations between process quality and children's outcomes and that provides general support that higher quality experiences within preschool programs are associated positively with children's development (Byrant, Burchinal, Lau, & Sparling, 1994;Dunn, 1993;Henderson & Wilson, 1988;Hestenes, Kontos, & Bryant, 1993;Howes & Smith, 1995;Lamb & Ahnert, 2006;NICHD-ECCRN, 1999;NICHD-ECCRN, 2002;Peisner-Feinberg et al, 2001;Peisner-Feinberg & Burchinal, 1997;Vandell, Schliecker, White, & Jacobs, 1991). However, relations between preschool quality and development tend to be small (NICHD-ECCRN & Duncan, 2003), and significant associations are not evident across all studies (e.g., Chin-Quee & Scarr, 1994;Deater-Deckard, Pinkerton, & Scarr, 1996;Goelman & Pence, 1987;Kontos, 1991;Kontos & Feine, 1987).…”
Section: Preschool Quality and Children's Developmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is an extensive literature that has examined associations between process quality and children's outcomes and that provides general support that higher quality experiences within preschool programs are associated positively with children's development (Byrant, Burchinal, Lau, & Sparling, 1994;Dunn, 1993;Henderson & Wilson, 1988;Hestenes, Kontos, & Bryant, 1993;Howes & Smith, 1995;Lamb & Ahnert, 2006;NICHD-ECCRN, 1999;NICHD-ECCRN, 2002;Peisner-Feinberg et al, 2001;Peisner-Feinberg & Burchinal, 1997;Vandell, Schliecker, White, & Jacobs, 1991). However, relations between preschool quality and development tend to be small (NICHD-ECCRN & Duncan, 2003), and significant associations are not evident across all studies (e.g., Chin-Quee & Scarr, 1994;Deater-Deckard, Pinkerton, & Scarr, 1996;Goelman & Pence, 1987;Kontos, 1991;Kontos & Feine, 1987).…”
Section: Preschool Quality and Children's Developmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two broad types of preschool program quality that have been identified are structural quality and process quality (Lamb, 1998;Phillips & Howes, 1987;Vandell & Wolfe, 2000). Structural features are those aspects of programs that have typically been targeted by regulation or financing and include teachers' levels of education and type of training, class size and ratio, the type of curriculum, and program services for parents and families, and many of these structural features are associated empirically with children's developmental outcomes (Burchinal, Roberts, Nabors, & Bryant, 1996;Dunn, 1993;Howes, 1997;NICHD ECCRN, 2002. Process quality refers to the features of preschool programs that children experience directly while they are enrolled in programs, such as the ways teachers implement activities and lessons, the nature and quality of interactions between adults and children and between children and their peers, the quality of space and furnishings, and the abundance of learning materials, and most studies of the associations between quality and outcomes have included measures of classroom processes.…”
Section: Preschool Quality and Children's Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preschool quality is a multifaceted, multilevel construct that includes a variety of program and classroom features, and a large body of literature exists in which correlates and consequences of these features have been evaluated, often separately in different studies that may focus on one or a few aspects of quality (e.g., Baydar & Brooks-Gunn, 1991;Bryant, Peisner-Feinberg, & Clifford, 1993;Bryant et al, 1994;Burchinal, Peisner-Feinberg, Bryant, & Clifford, 2000;Burchinal, Roberts, Nabors, & Bryant, 1996;Caughy, DiPietro, & Strobino, 1994;Dunn, 1993;Early et al, 2007;Gormley et al, 2005;Hagekull & Bohlin, 1995;Howes, 1997;Howes et al, 2008;NICHD ECCRN, 2002a, 2002bPeisner-Feinberg & Burchinal, 1997;Phillips, Howes, & Whitebook, 1992). As a result of the different methods of conceptualizing and measuring quality across studies, there is a mixture of evidence, particularly concerning the magnitude of associations between specific features of quality and children's development (NICHD ECCRN & Duncan, 2003).…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high ratio could facilitate a type of caregiver-child interaction which facilitates the developmental outcome of the child. Caregivers are assumed to have more positive, nurturant interactions with children and to give more individualized attention to children in small groups with higher caregiver-child ratios (Dunn, 1993). The addition of even one child to a day care setting can have a significant impact on the day care environment (Howes, Phillips & Whitebook, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of even one child to a day care setting can have a significant impact on the day care environment (Howes, Phillips & Whitebook, 1992). Therefore, variations in caregiver-child interaction as a function of variation in ratio are worthy of attention (Dunn, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%