1989
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90207-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratio of end-systolic stress to end-systolic volume: is it a useful clinical tool?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding of an inverse correlation between LV area or length in the two‐chamber view and age in our study agrees with the findings of previous transthoracic studies that demonstrated a decrease in both end‐systolic and end‐diastolic sizes of the LV with increasing age [14,27]. In contrast to others [14], we did not find an increase in LV wall thickness with increasing age, an observation that may be related to the careful exclusion of patients with increased arterial pressure from our study and the limited number of elderly patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding of an inverse correlation between LV area or length in the two‐chamber view and age in our study agrees with the findings of previous transthoracic studies that demonstrated a decrease in both end‐systolic and end‐diastolic sizes of the LV with increasing age [14,27]. In contrast to others [14], we did not find an increase in LV wall thickness with increasing age, an observation that may be related to the careful exclusion of patients with increased arterial pressure from our study and the limited number of elderly patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The two‐dimensional data (diameters, lengths and areas) were normalized for body surface area (BSA) and are presented as indices (I). In addition, the following functional variables were calculated: fractional area change (FAC %)=(EDA − ESA/EDA) × 100, stroke area index (SAI)=EDAI − ESAI, fractional diameter shortening (FS %)=(EDD − ESD/EDD) × 100, wall thickening (WT %)=(ESWT − EDWT/ESWT) × 100, velocity of circumferential fibre shortening (Vcfc)=[(EDC − ESC)/(EDC × LVET)] ×√RR [8,9], end‐systolic (meridional) wall stress (ESWS)=1.33 × SAP × ESA/TESA − ESA [10,11], stroke‐work index (SWI)=MAP × (EDAI − ESAI) [12], LV mass index (LVMI)=1.055 × 0.833 [(TESA × TEDL) − (ESA × EDL)]/BSA [6], relative wall thickness (RWT)=2 × EDWT/EDD [6], arterial stiffness index (ASI)=SAP − DAP/SAI [13], end‐systolic pressure/area ratio=SAP/ESA and end‐systolic wall stress/area ratio=ESWS/ESA [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not have information about either ventricular preload or the response of ventricular elastance to manipulation of loading conditions in our individuals and thus we can not make precise inferences about left ventricular contractility on the basis of this estimate of E es . However, considering the single point-determined E es as an index of the ability of the left ventricle to empty opposed to a given pressure [42] instead of an intrinsic property of the cardiac muscle, we used this index in the evaluation of ventricularvascular coupling, as suggested in a previous study [34]. Both in normotensive and hypertensive individuals the E a aE es ratio was on average close to 0.50, similar to previously reported normal values [10,11] which indicate optimal ventricular±vascular coupling in the whole hypertensive group.…”
Section: Ventricular±vascular Coupling and Left Ventricular Function mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies suggest that although this ratio appears to be relatively independent of changes in preload, it may be significantly influenced by changes in end-systolic volume and end-systolic pressure, that is, nonproportional changes in afterload. [16][17][18][19][20] Mild to moderate concentric left ventricular hypertrophy is commonly reported in weight lifters, rowers, and other athletes engaged in power-based sports. [33][34][35][36] Presumably, left ventricular hypertrophy develops due to repeated acute increases in left ventricular afterload and wall stress that occurs during the pressor response to isometric exercise.…”
Section: Submaximal Versus Maximal Deadliftmentioning
confidence: 99%