aObjective Effective arterial elastance (E a ), integrating the pulsatile component of left ventricular (LV) afterload, is an estimate of aortic input impedance. We evaluated relationships of E a with left ventricular anatomy and function in essential hypertension.Design A cross-sectional analysis in 81 normotensive and 174 untreated hypertensive individuals enrolled in a referral hypertension centre.Methods Using echocardiography we determined left ventricular mass index (LVMI), relative wall thickness (RWT), stroke volume (SV), endocardial (FS e ) and midwall (FS m ) fractional shortening and total peripheral resistance (TPR). Carotid pressure waveforms were obtained by arterial tonometry, and end-systolic pressure (P es ) was measured at the dicrotic notch. E a index (E a I) was calculated as P es /(SV index); LV elastance (E es ) was estimated as P es /LV end-systolic volume, and ventriculo± arterial coupling was evaluated by the E a /E es ratio.Results E a I was higher in hypertensives than in normotensives (3.02 6 0.63 versus 2.40 6 0.52 mmHg/l per m 2 ; P < 0.0001). Using the 95% upper con®dence limit in normotensives, hypertensives were divided in two groups with normal or elevated E a I. The 38 hypertensives with elevated E a I had higher RWT (0.41 6 0.06 versus 0.37 6 0.05), lower LVMI (87.5 6 18.5 versus 96.8 6 19.3 g/m 2 ), higher TPR (2247 6 408 versus 1658 6 371 dynes/cm s 25 ) and lower FS e and FS m (35 6 5 versus 39 6 5 and 16 6 2 versus 18 6 2%; all P < 0.05) than patients with normal E a I. E a /E es ratio was increased and cardiac output was reduced in hypertensives with elevated E a I.Conclusions High values of E a I identify a minority of hypertensive patients characterized by elevated TPR, left ventricular concentric remodelling, depressed left ventricular systolic function and impaired ventriculo± arterial coupling.