1996
DOI: 10.1086/262054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational Addiction to Caffeine: An Analysis of Coffee Consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidently, competition in the coffee market keeps the elasticity well below 1, which is the minimum we would expect with perfect collusion among the roasters. The finding of low price elasticity is consistent with studies on coffee demand in other countries, such as Bettendorf and Verboven, (2000) for the Netherlands, Feuerstein (2002) for West Germany, and and Olekalns and Bardsley (1996) for the US.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Evidently, competition in the coffee market keeps the elasticity well below 1, which is the minimum we would expect with perfect collusion among the roasters. The finding of low price elasticity is consistent with studies on coffee demand in other countries, such as Bettendorf and Verboven, (2000) for the Netherlands, Feuerstein (2002) for West Germany, and and Olekalns and Bardsley (1996) for the US.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The Becker and Murphy [3] theory has been applied to the consumption of cigarettes, see Chaloupka [8], Becker, Grossman and Murphy [9], Labeaga [10,11], Baltagi and Gri¢ n [12], Gruber and Köszegi [7] and Jones and Labeaga [13]; to the consumption of alcohol, see Grossman, Chaloupka and Sirtalan [14] and Baltagi and Gri¢ n [15]; to the consumption of ca¤eine, see Olekalns and Bardsley [16]; cocaine, see Grossman and Chaloupka [17] and illicit drugs, see Sa¤er and Chaloupka [18]. A key feature of this theory is that consumption of an addictive good will depend on future as well as past consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies have found that, consistent with the behavioural implications of the RA model, individuals tend to reduce their consumption of addictive substances as the anticipated future cost of these substances increases (Becker et al, 1991;Chaloupka, 1991;Waters & Sloan, 1995;Olekalns and Bardsley, 1996;Grossman & Chaloupka, 1998;Labeaga, 1999;Baltagi & Griffin, 2002). These consistent findings across studies have led to the acceptance of the RA model as the standard framework for modelling addiction (Gruber & Koszegi, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%