1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00137506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational decremental budgeting: Elements of an expenditure policy for the 1980s

Abstract: The dominant pattern of decision-making on public expenditures has been characterized as incremental budgeting. Wide-spread dissatisfaction with this approach has led to the emergence and testing of various techniques purporting to deal with expenditure decisions in a more rational, analytic and comprehensive fashion. Yet our experience with this brand of synoptic rationalism is at best mixed; few innovations in the field of budgeting have lived up to the expectations surrounding their introduction. A synthesi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s, it is possible to point to four theoretical lines of reasoning, each making somewhat different predictions about the choice by the budget actors between across-the-board and targeted strategies. Theories proceeding from the assumption of rational choice by the budget actors predict the making of targeted cuts on the basis of strategic priorities and the performance of the various organizations (in the case of macro-level cuts) and on the basis of the performance of organizational subunits and the programmes they deliver (in the case of cuts within organizations) (Jick and Murray, 1982; Lewis, 1984; Straussman, 1979; Tarschys, 1981). Theories focusing on political behaviour and party politics – dealing with the macro-level cutbacks – predict that cuts would be selective since decision-makers would want to minimize the opposition of the public and interest groups to the cuts and hence focus the cuts on those expenditure areas that hurt them the least (and hence ‘cost’ the least amount of votes) (Downs and Rocke, 1984; Hood et al., 1988; Jick and Murray, 1982; Lewis, 1984; Pammer, 1990; Rubin, 1985; Wolman and Davis, 1980).…”
Section: Cutback Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s, it is possible to point to four theoretical lines of reasoning, each making somewhat different predictions about the choice by the budget actors between across-the-board and targeted strategies. Theories proceeding from the assumption of rational choice by the budget actors predict the making of targeted cuts on the basis of strategic priorities and the performance of the various organizations (in the case of macro-level cuts) and on the basis of the performance of organizational subunits and the programmes they deliver (in the case of cuts within organizations) (Jick and Murray, 1982; Lewis, 1984; Straussman, 1979; Tarschys, 1981). Theories focusing on political behaviour and party politics – dealing with the macro-level cutbacks – predict that cuts would be selective since decision-makers would want to minimize the opposition of the public and interest groups to the cuts and hence focus the cuts on those expenditure areas that hurt them the least (and hence ‘cost’ the least amount of votes) (Downs and Rocke, 1984; Hood et al., 1988; Jick and Murray, 1982; Lewis, 1984; Pammer, 1990; Rubin, 1985; Wolman and Davis, 1980).…”
Section: Cutback Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capital expenditure can take drastic forms like elimination of capital spending from the budget, but also softer measures like a spending freeze on new projects, ‘postponing’ nonessential capital projects and cutting or deferring maintenance (Lewis and Logalbo, 1980). In normative discussions, several authors warn against cutting and postponing maintenance as the related future costs might be far in excess of today’s savings and may lead to subsequent and more costly capital acquisition in the long term (Lewis and Logalbo, 1980; McTighe, 1979; Tarschys, 1981).…”
Section: Contents Of Cutbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overload is the extent that an excess of growth occurs, however conceptualized and measured. To the extent that it is different from overload, financial scarcity for governments can also be expected to have significant structural effects (Rockman, 1984;Levine, 1978;Tarschys, 1981). Likewise, technological change has been found to be important for explaining the existence of certain types of organizations (Grafton, 1984).…”
Section: Growth Of Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%