“…At present, lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries have been considered as an advanced battery system with broad application prospects due to their ultrahigh theoretical energy density and low cost. − However, compared to traditional Li + battery systems, the commercialization of Li–S batteries still faces challenges. , First, the “shuttle effect” caused by the migration of lithium polysulfide (LiPS) intermediates within the battery reduces the cycling ability. − In addition, the generation of lithium dendrites, highly flammable organic electrolytes, and thermal runaway caused by exothermic redox reactions have become key factors limiting the development of Li–S batteries. − In order to further promote the commercialization of Li–S batteries, important strategies are mainly focused on sulfur cathode composites; however, safety concerns remain. − At present, replacing traditional liquid electrolytes with solid electrolytes is generally considered to be a more effective measure to overcome the obstacles to the development of Li–S batteries. , Compared with inorganic-based solid electrolytes, , solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) have the advantages of good flexibility and easy film formation, which can make the electrode interface in close contact. , Up to now, due to its excellent film-forming performance and electrochemical stability, poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) has been widely studied and applied in all solid-state Li + batteries. , However, the low ionic conductivity and narrow electrochemical stability window of PEO-based SPEs at room temperature severely restrict their practical application in lithium-ion batteries. Past research has shown that the fundamental reason for Li + transport is the segmental motion of PEO molecular chains in the amorphous part, and the method of adding fillers to increase the amorphous phase and improve its mechanical and electrochemical performance becomes increasingly popular in recent years .…”