2017
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00175
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational Design of Novel Allosteric Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitors Showing Antibacterial Effects on Drug-Resistant Escherichia coli Escape Variants

Abstract: In drug-discovery, systematic variations of substituents on a common scaffold and bioisosteric replacements are often used to generate diversity and obtain molecules with better biological effects. However, this could saturate the small-molecule diversity pool resulting in drug-resistance. On the other hand, conventional drug-discovery relies on targeting known pockets on protein surfaces leading to drug resistance by mutations of critical pocket residues. Here, we present a two-pronged strategy of designing n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, on comparing the conformation of AMPQD to FH4 and trimethoprim to FH4, there are subtle differences in the van der Waals envelopes. The trimethoprim eDHFR escape variants of E. coli DHFR possess mutations that also block the inhibitory function of AMPQD 57 . By studying the differences in interactions, one can search for other ligands that minimize these interaction differences with FH2 and FH4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4, on comparing the conformation of AMPQD to FH4 and trimethoprim to FH4, there are subtle differences in the van der Waals envelopes. The trimethoprim eDHFR escape variants of E. coli DHFR possess mutations that also block the inhibitory function of AMPQD 57 . By studying the differences in interactions, one can search for other ligands that minimize these interaction differences with FH2 and FH4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed Met20 loop’s conformational dynamics in the current eDHFR substrate/product/inhibitor complexes are consistent with ligand-dependent conformational sampling and energy landscape shaping during catalysis. Exploiting the conformational diversity of eDHFR, especially targeting the energetically favorable occluded conformations of the FH4 and AMPQD complexes and DHFR’s allosteric sites, may enable the design of effective next-generation therapeutics to target DHFR with species-specificity 38,57 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibitors can bind the target only if the substrate is present and this mechanism of action should be favorable for enzymes with cellular substrate concentration higher than the enzyme K m value [40]. Several drugs act in an uncompetitive manner towards dehydrogenases or reductases with a NAD + /NADH pair as their enzyme cofactor: e.g., mycophenolic acid, reversible inhibitor of inosine 5 -monophosphate dehydrogenase [41,42]; ononetin, an inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase [43]; or epristeride, an inhibitor of human steroid 5α-reductase [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the top nine best compounds tested from our studies (along with appropriate positive and negative controls) against a panel of seven organisms belonging to the gram positive, gram negative and yeast cells returned non-significant inhibition at a concentration of 20 μM (unpublished results). However, our pocket based approaches (section 2.6), apart from picking the classical and non-classical inhibitors 60 , 80 , 81 , were also successful in predicting a unique set of inhibitors targeting a novel allosteric pocket. These compounds had MIC values very similar to their IC 50 values for the enzyme strongly suggesting that they can efficiently diffuse across gram negative bacterial cell membranes 80 , 81 .…”
Section: Classification Of Dhfr Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%