2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2024.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational design of organic molecules with inverted gaps between the first excited singlet and triplet

Robert Pollice,
Benjamin Ding,
Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 247 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and V), for a total of ≈1650 entries with ≈20% of IST candidates (i.e., molecules showing Δ E ST ref < 0) . It is worth noticing that in the reference data provided with DS1, azulene itself occurs twice in the data set, and in both instances, it is associated with a negative gap (Δ E ST ref ≈ −3 meV and Δ E ST ref ≈ −66 meV), in contrast to experiments: azulene is known to have Δ E ST > 0. ,, In our case, only one candidate presents a nitrogen-substituted azulene scaffold (showing Δ E ST > 0 for both vertical and adiabatic gaps computed at ADC(2)/cc-pVDZ level on M06-2X/def2-TZVP geometries); 6 out of 15 azulenes are predicted with small negative gaps (Δ E ST ML ≥ −10 meV), while 6 more show −10 meV > Δ E ST ML ≥ −40 meV. On the basis of these considerations, we believe that azulene scaffolds reported in Figure are indeed FPs, although it has been recently shown that different patterns of fusion between azulene scaffolds can yield both positive and negative Δ E ST gaps. , Suboptimal quality of reference data on (at least some) azulenes might be one of the possible reasons for this result: the model has learnt that several molecules containing the azulene core should have Δ E ST < 0, which points toward an obvious way to improve performance, i.e., obtaining training data that are more accurate from the quantitative point of view.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…and V), for a total of ≈1650 entries with ≈20% of IST candidates (i.e., molecules showing Δ E ST ref < 0) . It is worth noticing that in the reference data provided with DS1, azulene itself occurs twice in the data set, and in both instances, it is associated with a negative gap (Δ E ST ref ≈ −3 meV and Δ E ST ref ≈ −66 meV), in contrast to experiments: azulene is known to have Δ E ST > 0. ,, In our case, only one candidate presents a nitrogen-substituted azulene scaffold (showing Δ E ST > 0 for both vertical and adiabatic gaps computed at ADC(2)/cc-pVDZ level on M06-2X/def2-TZVP geometries); 6 out of 15 azulenes are predicted with small negative gaps (Δ E ST ML ≥ −10 meV), while 6 more show −10 meV > Δ E ST ML ≥ −40 meV. On the basis of these considerations, we believe that azulene scaffolds reported in Figure are indeed FPs, although it has been recently shown that different patterns of fusion between azulene scaffolds can yield both positive and negative Δ E ST gaps. , Suboptimal quality of reference data on (at least some) azulenes might be one of the possible reasons for this result: the model has learnt that several molecules containing the azulene core should have Δ E ST < 0, which points toward an obvious way to improve performance, i.e., obtaining training data that are more accurate from the quantitative point of view.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and V), for a total of ≈1650 entries with ≈20% of IST candidates (i.e., molecules showing ΔE ST ref < 0). 17 It is worth noticing that in the reference data provided with DS1, azulene itself occurs twice in the data set, and in both instances, it is associated with a negative gap (ΔE ST ref ≈ −3 meV and ΔE ST ref ≈ −66 meV), in contrast to experiments: azulene is known to have ΔE ST > 0. 17,69,70 In our case, only one candidate presents a nitrogen-substituted azulene scaffold (showing ΔE ST > 0 for both vertical and adiabatic gaps computed at ADC(2)/cc-pVDZ level on M06-2X/def2-TZVP geometries); 6 out of 15 azulenes are predicted with small negative gaps (ΔE ST ML ≥ −10 meV), while 6 more show −10 meV > ΔE ST ML ≥ −40 meV.…”
Section: The Journal Ofmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations