1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02681355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational distribution of the thermal load along a glass-melting tank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum temperature zone, as a rule, is oriented toward the middle of the clarification zone [5]. There are different opinions regarding the position of the temperature maximum, as applied to furnaces with a lateral flame direction: in the middle of the melting tank [6], at a distance of 2/3 of the tank length from the charging hopper [4]; near or above the spillway [7]. At the same time, the authors in [8] note that the quellpunkt position along the length of the tank is not clearly determined and does not always coincide with the temperature maximum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum temperature zone, as a rule, is oriented toward the middle of the clarification zone [5]. There are different opinions regarding the position of the temperature maximum, as applied to furnaces with a lateral flame direction: in the middle of the melting tank [6], at a distance of 2/3 of the tank length from the charging hopper [4]; near or above the spillway [7]. At the same time, the authors in [8] note that the quellpunkt position along the length of the tank is not clearly determined and does not always coincide with the temperature maximum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature levels for the particular zones are specified based on practical data. For a furnace with the specific glass melt output over 2 tons/m 2 per day the maximum temperature can reach 1600°C [6]. Considering the service temperature constraint on the silica brick roof, the method of stabilizing temperature in the working space by varying the fuel rate appears questionable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%