2017
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationale and design of TRANSITION: a randomized trial of pre‐discharge vs. post‐discharge initiation of sacubitril/valsartan

Abstract: AimsThe prognosis after hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains poor, especially <30 days post‐discharge. Evidence‐based medications with prognostic impact administered at discharge improve survival and hospital readmission, but robust studies comparing pre‐discharge with post‐discharge initiation are rare. The PARADIGM‐HF trial established sacubitril/valsartan as a new evidence‐based therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<40%) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to PIONEER‐HF, patients enrolled in TRANSITION were, on average, 6 years older and suffered more from diabetes, coronary artery disease, previous myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation, but less from hypertension (online supplementary Tables S3 and S4). Median NT‐proBNP at randomisation was lower in TRANSITION compared to PIONEER‐HF, owing to differences in the respective trial protocols . The differences in prior HF treatments received by patients in PIONEER‐HF and TRANSITION are explained by higher proportion of ACEI/ARB‐naïve patients recruited in PIONEER‐HF and the general lower use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in the US …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to PIONEER‐HF, patients enrolled in TRANSITION were, on average, 6 years older and suffered more from diabetes, coronary artery disease, previous myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation, but less from hypertension (online supplementary Tables S3 and S4). Median NT‐proBNP at randomisation was lower in TRANSITION compared to PIONEER‐HF, owing to differences in the respective trial protocols . The differences in prior HF treatments received by patients in PIONEER‐HF and TRANSITION are explained by higher proportion of ACEI/ARB‐naïve patients recruited in PIONEER‐HF and the general lower use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in the US …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TRANSITION (NCT02661217) was a randomised, multicentre, open‐label study performed in 19 countries and 156 hospitals worldwide. The study design and rationale have been previously published . The study included male or female patients aged ≥ 18 years who were hospitalised for an episode of ADHF ( de novo HF or due to exacerbation of chronic HF), with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV, blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg and left‐ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ongoing clinical trials, including the PIONEER‐HF (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT‐Pro‐BNP in Patients Stabilized From an Acute Heart Failure Episode) study9 and the TRANSITION (Comparison of Pre‐ and Post‐Discharge Initiation of LCZ696 Therapy in HFrEF Patients After an Acute Decompensation Event) study,10 will provide valuable information about the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a recent episode of acute HF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TRANSITION study was an international, prospective, multicentre, randomized, open‐label clinical trial performed at 156 sites in 19 countries. The study enrolled patients ≥ 18 years of age hospitalized for a primary diagnosis of ADHF with an ejection fraction ≤ 40%, New York Heart Association functional class II–IV symptoms, and a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 100 mmHg.…”
Section: Overview Of Key Clinical Trials Assessing the Role Of In‐hosmentioning
confidence: 99%