2019
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationale and design of the DIGIT‐HF trial (DIGitoxin to Improve ouTcomes in patients with advanced chronic Heart Failure): a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study

Abstract: Aims Despite recent advances in the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF), mortality and hospitalizations still remain high. Additional therapies to improve mortality and morbidity are urgently needed. The efficacy of cardiac glycosides – although regularly used for HF treatment – remains unclear. DIGIT‐HF was designed to demonstrate that digitoxin on top of standard of care treatment improves mortality and morbidity in patients with HF and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods Patients with chronic H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The group believes that a series of randomized controlled trials is required comparing ‘non‐aggressive’ pharmacological rate control, avoiding amiodarone or Class I antiarrhythmic agents and higher doses or plasma concentrations of digoxin with the following procedures: PV (and/or AV node) ablation for paroxysmal AF and HF vs ‘non‐aggressive’ pharmacological rate control (and avoiding all of: amiodarone, Class I antiarrhythmic agents, higher doses or higher plasma concentrations of digoxin). PV (and/or AV node) ablation for persistent AF and HF with or without a back‐up pacing device vs ‘non‐aggressive’ pharmacological rate control (and avoiding all of: amiodarone, Class I antiarrhythmic agents, higher doses or higher plasma concentrations of digoxin). PV (and/or AV node) ablation in HF patients with CRT vs. usual care. There is also a need for randomized controlled trials comparing different rate control strategies, including: high‐ vs. low‐dose beta‐blocker; addition of digoxin to beta‐blockers. The ongoing DIGIT‐HF (DIGitoxin to Improve ouTcomes in patients with advanced chronic Heart Failure) trial includes patients with AF, but excludes patients in need of rate control with digitalis glycosides There is also a need for randomized controlled trials investigating: new agents for pharmacological rhythm control (double‐blind vs. placebo); prevention of AF (double‐blind vs. placebo); better treatments to prevent AF recurrence (double‐blind vs. placebo). …”
Section: Device‐based Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The group believes that a series of randomized controlled trials is required comparing ‘non‐aggressive’ pharmacological rate control, avoiding amiodarone or Class I antiarrhythmic agents and higher doses or plasma concentrations of digoxin with the following procedures: PV (and/or AV node) ablation for paroxysmal AF and HF vs ‘non‐aggressive’ pharmacological rate control (and avoiding all of: amiodarone, Class I antiarrhythmic agents, higher doses or higher plasma concentrations of digoxin). PV (and/or AV node) ablation for persistent AF and HF with or without a back‐up pacing device vs ‘non‐aggressive’ pharmacological rate control (and avoiding all of: amiodarone, Class I antiarrhythmic agents, higher doses or higher plasma concentrations of digoxin). PV (and/or AV node) ablation in HF patients with CRT vs. usual care. There is also a need for randomized controlled trials comparing different rate control strategies, including: high‐ vs. low‐dose beta‐blocker; addition of digoxin to beta‐blockers. The ongoing DIGIT‐HF (DIGitoxin to Improve ouTcomes in patients with advanced chronic Heart Failure) trial includes patients with AF, but excludes patients in need of rate control with digitalis glycosides There is also a need for randomized controlled trials investigating: new agents for pharmacological rhythm control (double‐blind vs. placebo); prevention of AF (double‐blind vs. placebo); better treatments to prevent AF recurrence (double‐blind vs. placebo). …”
Section: Device‐based Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing DIGIT-HF (DIGitoxin to Improve ouTcomes in patients with advanced chronic Heart Failure) trial includes patients with AF, but excludes patients in need of rate control with digitalis glycosides. 78 5 There is also a need for randomized controlled trials investigating:…”
Section: Consensus Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflict of interest: L.A.D., K.W., U.B., J.B., and A.K. are involved in the conduct of the DIGIT-HF trial 28 (Eudra-CT: 2013-005326-38) funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digitalis glycosides are used quite often for this purpose; however, as the DIG trial did not include patients with AF, current evidence is scarce. The ongoing DIGIT‐HF trial (http://www.digit-hf.de, EudraCT‐No. : 2013–005326‐38) as well as the DECISION trial (http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03783429) will provide data in the future.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%