2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationale and Design of the Groningen Intervention Study for the Preservation of Cardiac Function with Sodium Thiosulfate after St-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (GIPS-IV) trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects were accompanied by an increase in endogenous H 2 S, which was suggested to be responsible for the therapeutic effects. Recently, a clinical trial in the Netherlands examined the effects of administering STS to patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction prior to restoring perfusion through percutaneous coronary intervention [ 89 ]. Unfortunately, the researchers observed no effect of the STS treatment on infarct size, leading to the discontinuation of the trial [ 90 ].…”
Section: Sodium Thiosulfate: a Clinically Viable H 2 ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects were accompanied by an increase in endogenous H 2 S, which was suggested to be responsible for the therapeutic effects. Recently, a clinical trial in the Netherlands examined the effects of administering STS to patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction prior to restoring perfusion through percutaneous coronary intervention [ 89 ]. Unfortunately, the researchers observed no effect of the STS treatment on infarct size, leading to the discontinuation of the trial [ 90 ].…”
Section: Sodium Thiosulfate: a Clinically Viable H 2 ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No serious adverse events were observed [74]. The same group will investigate the potential benefit of an intervention Na 2 S 2 O 3 in a follow-up double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (GIPS-IV), with a planned enrollment of 380 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [75]. Patients will receive 12.5 g Na 2 S 2 O 3 directly after admission and a second dose 6 h later.…”
Section: Clinical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients will receive 12.5 g Na 2 S 2 O 3 directly after admission and a second dose 6 h later. The primary endpoint is myocardial infarct size after 4 months; secondary endpoints include the effects of Na 2 S 2 O 3 on peak CK-MB (creatine kinase muscle brain type, as an early measure of MI) during admission and left ventricular ejection fraction and NT-proBNP (N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, as a measure of heart insufficiency) levels at 4 months follow-up [75]. The group expects first results on the primary endpoint soon ("Q1 2022"), but no updates have been published yet.…”
Section: Clinical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodium thiosulfate (STS) has been used to deal with calciphylaxis in clinic and provided potential opportunity against various ectopic calcification including VC. Findings from experimental studies suggested that STS attenuated VC possibly due to its potent chelating and antioxidant properties. , However, recent clinical evidence from GIPS-IV study reported that STS did not improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction because most patients can not tolerate high doses of STS due to offensively strong odor and adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting . In addition, traditional systemic administration of STS has been associated with severe adverse effects in normal organs due to undesirable accumulation in normal tissues such as the reduction of bone mineral density. , Moreover, only a small fraction of STS could actually reach the site of VC .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 , 14 However, recent clinical evidence from GIPS-IV study reported that STS did not improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction 15 because most patients can not tolerate high doses of STS due to offensively strong odor and adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting. 15 In addition, traditional systemic administration of STS has been associated with severe adverse effects in normal organs due to undesirable accumulation in normal tissues such as the reduction of bone mineral density. 13 , 16 Moreover, only a small fraction of STS could actually reach the site of VC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%