2014
DOI: 10.9790/0853-131274145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationale for Implementing Dose Reference Level as a Quality Assurance Tool in Medical Radiography in Nigeria

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tube focus to the patient surface distance ( d FSD ) must be calculated ( Eq. (1a ) or ( 1b )) [59] . The d FSD is calculated by subtracting the thickness of the patient ( t p ) from the tube focusto-patient support distance ( d FTD ) for CR or DR equipment as indicated in Eq.…”
Section: Calculating the Focal-spot-to-surface Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tube focus to the patient surface distance ( d FSD ) must be calculated ( Eq. (1a ) or ( 1b )) [59] . The d FSD is calculated by subtracting the thickness of the patient ( t p ) from the tube focusto-patient support distance ( d FTD ) for CR or DR equipment as indicated in Eq.…”
Section: Calculating the Focal-spot-to-surface Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this, every exposure to diagnostic x-rays needs to be justified and optimized in terms of risk and benefit [2]. One of the major ways of assessing radiation dose received in diagnostic and therapeutic radiography is monitoring of patients during the examination [3]. Diagnostic X-rays are used for diagnosing diseases and other problems during medical examinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the doses delivered to patients during medical imaging examinations are not sufficiently controlled and the working protocols for a given examination differ from one hospital service to another. These variations indicate that good imaging technique is needed to reduce the dose to patients at the lowest practicable level to respond to the clinic and make the diagnosis [1]. These large variations in the doses delivered to patients for the same examination also show a crucial importance for the study of dose variations [2], for quality assurance and standardization of protocols [3], in order to guarantee the optimization of doses to patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%