Rationale of Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynaecological Oncology: Time to Address the Issue!

Makhija, Aman; Parekh, Chetana; Mankad, Meeta; Desai, Ajesh; Dave, Pariseema; Patel, Shilpa M.

doi:10.1007/s40944-018-0219-4

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In another study by Demir et al, the results showed that 97.8% of women with adnexal masses of 8 -13 cm treated with laparoscopy had blood loss of < 200 cc (9). These results confirm the findings of the present study on the low bleeding in laparoscopic treatment of large adnexal masses, which is considered as one of the important advantages of laparoscopy vs. laparotomy (17,18). The mean operation time was 128.88 ± 63.37 minutes in our study.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Laparoscopic Management of Large Adnexal Masses

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Adnexal mass is one of the most common gynecologic diseases among women of all ages. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 126 patients with large adnexal masses (≥ 10 cm) managed by laparoscopic surgery during 2013 - 2020. The rates of intraoperative complications, conversion to open surgery, and incidence of cancer were assessed. Results: Mean mass size was 15.08 ± 5.03 in all participants without significant difference based on the tumor type (P = 0.624). Mean age and operation time were higher in the malignant type compared to the benign type (P < 0.001). Type of surgery and frequency of intraoperative complications were also different among patients with different tumor types (P < 0.001 and P = 0.816, respectively). Conclusions: Our study showed that large adnexal tumors can be operated by laparoscopic approach, while the most important factor for increased surgical complications and duration was malignancy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Laparoscopic Management of Large Adnexal Masses

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In another study by Demir et al, the results showed that 97.8% of women with adnexal masses of 8-13cm treated with laparoscopy had blood loss < 200 cc (9). These results con rm that of the present study on the low bleeding in laparoscopic treatment of large adnexal masses, considered one of the important advantages of laparoscopy vs. laparotomy (17,18). The mean operation time was 128.88 ± 63.37 minutes in our study.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Laparoscopic Management of Large Adnexal Masses

Nouri

Arab

Afshari

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To report the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic resection of large adnexal masses (≥10 cm). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 126 patients with large adnexal masses (≥10 cm), managed by laparoscopic surgery during 2013 to 2020. The rates of intraoperative complications, conversion to open surgery and incidence of cancer were assessed.Results: Mean mass size was 15.08±5.03 in all participants without significant difference based on the tumor type (P=.624). Mean age and operation time were higher in the malignant type compared to that of the benign type (P<.001). Type of surgery and frequency of intra-operative complications were also different among patients with different tumor types (P<.001 and .003, respectively).Conclusion: Our study showed that large adnexal tumors can be operated by laparoscopic approach, while the most important factor for increased surgical complications and duration was malignancy.

show abstract

Rationale of Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynaecological Oncology: Time to Address the Issue!

Cited by 2 publications

References 22 publications

Laparoscopic Management of Large Adnexal Masses

Laparoscopic Management of Large Adnexal Masses

Laparoscopic Management of Large Adnexal Masses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About