“…Scholars working within the field of International Relations have been the most interested in using Bourdieu's concepts for analysing relations on scales beyond the national scale, though they have tended to focus less upon his field concept and more on concepts like habitus and practice, eg Adler-Nissen (2012),Berling (2012),Bigo (2007), Leander (2011), and Mérand (2010. The potential of field analysis for analysing international, transnational or global relations is indicated in the work of scholars, who have already used it to discuss a diversity of phenomena: art(Buchholz, 2013), forms of expertise associated with the European Union(Bigo, 2011;Mérand, 2010;Mudge and Vauchez, 2012;Vauchez, 2008Vauchez, , 2011Georgakakis, 2011;Cohen, 2011); the field of empires(Go, 2008); colonial states(Steinmetz 2007(Steinmetz , 2008; social science(Guilhot, 2014;Heilbron et al, 2008;Heilbron, 2014), democracy promotion and humanitarian relief(Guilhot, 2001(Guilhot, , 2005(Guilhot, , 2007Krause, 2014), international law and international commercial law(Dezalay and Garth, 1995, 1998, 2002a, 2002bHagan, 2005), among other sites(Adler-Nissen, 2012;Guilhot, 2007;Leavitt and Glick-Schiller, 2004;Marginson, 2008;Stampnitzky, 2011; see alsoBohn, 2006 andSapiro, 2013). 2 For example, this volume includes a paper by Petzke on transnational religion using a field perspective ...…”