1998
DOI: 10.1080/03085149800000026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationalities and refugee resettlement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From here, we analyzed those policy constructions using the Foucauldian notion of governmentality (Foucault 2007(Foucault , 2008, seeking to tease out the context-specific political logics which inform such constructions. This approach helped us to expose the multiple and nuanced political underpinnings of EM policy (Lippert 1998;O'Malley 1999;Pratt 2005), correcting monolithic accounts of neoliberalism as the sole compelling force behind Western contemporary penal policymaking (Dunn 2017;Rose 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From here, we analyzed those policy constructions using the Foucauldian notion of governmentality (Foucault 2007(Foucault , 2008, seeking to tease out the context-specific political logics which inform such constructions. This approach helped us to expose the multiple and nuanced political underpinnings of EM policy (Lippert 1998;O'Malley 1999;Pratt 2005), correcting monolithic accounts of neoliberalism as the sole compelling force behind Western contemporary penal policymaking (Dunn 2017;Rose 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other approach sees global power through the lens of ‘governmentality’ (Duffield, ; Larner and Walters, ; Hardt and Negri, ), inspired by the work of Michel Foucault et al ., (). Accounts either emphasize NGOs as sites of disciplinary power themselves, such as in micro‐credit programs (Rankin, ), or refugee settlement (Lippert, ). Or they imagine NGOs as integrated into a ‘strategic complex of liberal governance’ (Duffield, ), governmentality (Sending and Neumann, ) or empire (Hardt and Negri, ).…”
Section: Fields Beyond the Nation Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars working within the field of International Relations have been the most interested in using Bourdieu's concepts for analysing relations on scales beyond the national scale, though they have tended to focus less upon his field concept and more on concepts like habitus and practice, eg Adler-Nissen (2012),Berling (2012),Bigo (2007), Leander (2011), and Mérand (2010. The potential of field analysis for analysing international, transnational or global relations is indicated in the work of scholars, who have already used it to discuss a diversity of phenomena: art(Buchholz, 2013), forms of expertise associated with the European Union(Bigo, 2011;Mérand, 2010;Mudge and Vauchez, 2012;Vauchez, 2008Vauchez, , 2011Georgakakis, 2011;Cohen, 2011); the field of empires(Go, 2008); colonial states(Steinmetz 2007(Steinmetz , 2008; social science(Guilhot, 2014;Heilbron et al, 2008;Heilbron, 2014), democracy promotion and humanitarian relief(Guilhot, 2001(Guilhot, , 2005(Guilhot, , 2007Krause, 2014), international law and international commercial law(Dezalay and Garth, 1995, 1998, 2002a, 2002bHagan, 2005), among other sites(Adler-Nissen, 2012;Guilhot, 2007;Leavitt and Glick-Schiller, 2004;Marginson, 2008;Stampnitzky, 2011; see alsoBohn, 2006 andSapiro, 2013). 2 For example, this volume includes a paper by Petzke on transnational religion using a field perspective ...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%