1990
DOI: 10.2307/2938316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities

Abstract: RATIONALIZABILITY, LEARNING, AND EQUILIBRIUM IN GAMES WITH STRATEGIC COMPLEMENTARITIES BY PAUL MILGROM AND JOHN ROBERTS1 We study a rich class of noncooperative games that includes models of oligopoly competition, macroeconomic coordination failures, arms races, bank runs, technology adoption and diffusion, R&D competition, pretrial bargaining, coordination in teams, and many others. For all these games, the sets of pure strategy Nash equilibria, correlated equilibria, and rationalizable strategies have identi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,019
1
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,470 publications
(1,040 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
1,019
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper also contributes to a large literature on games with strategy complementarities, also known as supermodular games. These games were first studied as a class by Topkis [28] and are further analyzed by Vives [30] and Milgrom and Roberts [19]. The connection between our findings and existing results on supermodular games is discussed in the conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper also contributes to a large literature on games with strategy complementarities, also known as supermodular games. These games were first studied as a class by Topkis [28] and are further analyzed by Vives [30] and Milgrom and Roberts [19]. The connection between our findings and existing results on supermodular games is discussed in the conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In case (3), noise-independent selection holds even without own-action quasiconcavity. 4 See Milgrom and Roberts [19] for a survey of applications. 5 Morris and Shin [25] survey such applications and describe sufficient conditions for limit uniqueness in games with a continuum of identical players and two actions, under slightly weaker technical assumptions than those assumed in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Payoff functions having the supermodularity property and the related property of increasing differences make many games brimming with special properties; see e.g., Topkis (1979), Milgrom and Roberts (1990), Vives (1990), and Lippman and McCardle (1997) as references.…”
Section: Background Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition alumni have greater incentives 17 It can reasonably be objected that the quality of a university is not adequately measured by a single real number. However we note that multi-dimensional theories of strategic complementarity exist (see Roberts (1990), Milgrom andShannon (1994)) hence we remain con dent that our results would still hold in a more realistic setting where we allow for multiple aspects of quality. 18 There may also be some more direct externalities if there is cross teaching between nearby universities especially joint PhD programmes.…”
Section: Universitiesmentioning
confidence: 68%