2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-011-9644-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationalizing cellulose (in)solubility: reviewing basic physicochemical aspects and role of hydrophobic interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
314
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 482 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
314
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…A naive analogy to the acetate binding observed here would suggest that the mechanism of charging in aqueous TBAH is binding of OH À ions. However, in light of the lack of frustration in aqueous systems (Medronho et al 2012), this appears unlikely. An alternative explanation for the presence of charge on the cellulose chains is provided by the recent observation that cellulose is deprotonated in aqueous alkali (Bialik et al 2016), as anticipated by Lindman et al (Medronho and Lindman 2014;Alves et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A naive analogy to the acetate binding observed here would suggest that the mechanism of charging in aqueous TBAH is binding of OH À ions. However, in light of the lack of frustration in aqueous systems (Medronho et al 2012), this appears unlikely. An alternative explanation for the presence of charge on the cellulose chains is provided by the recent observation that cellulose is deprotonated in aqueous alkali (Bialik et al 2016), as anticipated by Lindman et al (Medronho and Lindman 2014;Alves et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over decades the hydrogen bonds network in cellulose has been claimed as the reason of the crystalline structure of cellulose and the limitations in cellulose dissolution (Bodvik et al 2010;Zhang et al 2002), while the amphiphilic nature of cellulose has probably been underestimated (Medronho et al 2012. Thus, when developing efficient solvents for cellulose dissolution, not only the intermolecular hydrogen bonds need to be overcome, but also the hydrophobic chain interactions have to be minimized (Glasser et al 2012;Medronho et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the established dominance of the hydrophilic surfaces of cellulose, the amphiphilic character of cellulose, which has been underestimated in the past, is attracting more and more attention (Medronho et al 2012). As it is believed that in some cases, it is the occurrence of minor hydrophobic surfaces that play a determinant role in the reactivity of cellulose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%