2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2017.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationalizing the formation of binary mixed thiol self-assembled monolayers

Abstract: International audiencePeriodic DFT-D calculations are used to decipher the role of intermolecular forces on the stability of mixed linear thiol self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on Au(111) and compared with experiment. The interaction energy is rationalized by quantifying its different contributions. The inter-chain interaction energy is shown to be in direct relation with the surface reconstruction and the formation of adatoms. The stability of the mixed SAM systems is predicted by calculations and validated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, the binding energy of alkylthiols varies from −25 kcal/mol for conjugated molecules to −44 kcal/mol depending on the length and the chemical structure. 41,42 The above values can also be compared with that calculated (with two different methods) for Au− C(aryl) bonds obtained by grafting diazonium salts on gold: −34.4 kcal/mol (Au19−C 6 H 5 ) 12 and −24.0 kcal/mol [Au(111), TOP site]−C 6 H 5 . 23 These calculations indicate that the energy of Au(111)−C(alkyl) bond is equivalent to that of an Au−C(aryl) bond; the Au(111)−S−alkyl bond is more stable than the Au(111)−C(alkyl) one by −8.6 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Bonding Energies On An Au Slabmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, the binding energy of alkylthiols varies from −25 kcal/mol for conjugated molecules to −44 kcal/mol depending on the length and the chemical structure. 41,42 The above values can also be compared with that calculated (with two different methods) for Au− C(aryl) bonds obtained by grafting diazonium salts on gold: −34.4 kcal/mol (Au19−C 6 H 5 ) 12 and −24.0 kcal/mol [Au(111), TOP site]−C 6 H 5 . 23 These calculations indicate that the energy of Au(111)−C(alkyl) bond is equivalent to that of an Au−C(aryl) bond; the Au(111)−S−alkyl bond is more stable than the Au(111)−C(alkyl) one by −8.6 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Bonding Energies On An Au Slabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the binding energy of alkylthiols varies from −25 kcal/mol for conjugated molecules to −44 kcal/mol depending on the length and the chemical structure. 41,42 The above values can also be compared and there is no apparent pulling of gold atoms from the surface. Considering the above computed bond energies that indicate a significant difference of ∼−8.6 kcal/mol between the two grafted molecules, one should, in principle, be able to replace reversibly the bonded moiety.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Bonding Energies On An Au Slabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenyl mercaptans with different terminal functional groups, including 4‐mercaptophenol, 4‐aminothiophenol, 4‐methylthiophenol, and thiophenol, can be used to investigate the effect of the chemical environment on SERS. The phenyl thiol in the aqueous solution was directly chemisorbed onto the Au‐D surface with a thiol functional group . After surface modification, the Au‐Ds can retain the nanostructures and morphology (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the dispersion interactions represent 60% (eq ) of the total adsorption energy, and 30% and 40% of the intramolecular interaction energy for the S-CH 3 and 68% for the S-CC thiol SAM, respectively. The latter has been calculated using the Au–S binding energy of 2.60 eV of alkyl chain thiols …”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%