2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationally designed dual functional block copolymers for bottlebrush-like coatings: In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and antifouling properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
97
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accumulation of organic debris on the surface might lead to shielding of the active killing material (in particular for chemically functionalized surfaces), thereby reducing the bactericidal efficacy. Some attempts have hence been made to combine passive-defense antibacterial surfaces, which reduce the rate of bacteria sticking, with the bactericidal functionality [46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulation of organic debris on the surface might lead to shielding of the active killing material (in particular for chemically functionalized surfaces), thereby reducing the bactericidal efficacy. Some attempts have hence been made to combine passive-defense antibacterial surfaces, which reduce the rate of bacteria sticking, with the bactericidal functionality [46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface modification techniques such as block co-polymerization [26,27], covalent grafting of hydrophilic groups to surfaces [28], nanoparticle functionalization [29,30], atom transfer radical polymerization [31], Radio Frequency plasma deposition and modifications of surfaces have been used to fabricate surfaces showing antifouling properties. Kim et al modified nanofiltration thin film composite membranes to be more hydrophilic by a treatment with NH 3 plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figs and , PU‐2 had no effect or led to a modest increase in bacterial attachment compared to PU‐1, which means the small amount of EF in the material did not improve its anti‐adhesion properties. This result was not unexpected, as a fluorine‐containing material surface has been previously shown to support bacterial attachment . Researchers also found that polymer having a low fluorine content could not effectively inhibit benthic diatom adhesion .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, biofouling of bacteria and proteins on PU surfaces is also found frequently which limits the application of PUs as indwelling biomaterials. Surface modification of PUs with hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol), betaine or hydrophobic perfluorocarbon chains renders PUs with good antifouling activities . As typical multi‐blocked copolymers, microphase separation between the soft and hard blocks is a characteristic property for PUs which is known to relate to their good mechanical properties and biocompatibilities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%