2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rats’ memory for event duration in delayed matching-to-sample with nonspatial comparison response alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of memory for temporal duration in rats has not produced consistent evidence of a choose-short effect. Although some studies have reported a choose-short effect (e. g., Church, 1980;Santi, Weise, & Kuiper, 1995), other studies have reported a choose-long effect (Meck, Church, & Olton, 1984;Santi, Stanford, & Coyle, 1997;Van Rooyen, McMillan, & Santi, 2008). Unfortunately, no single procedural variable or combination of variables appears to be clearly linked to the occurrence of a choose-short or a choose-long bias during delay testing in rats.…”
Section: Memory For Temporal Durationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of memory for temporal duration in rats has not produced consistent evidence of a choose-short effect. Although some studies have reported a choose-short effect (e. g., Church, 1980;Santi, Weise, & Kuiper, 1995), other studies have reported a choose-long effect (Meck, Church, & Olton, 1984;Santi, Stanford, & Coyle, 1997;Van Rooyen, McMillan, & Santi, 2008). Unfortunately, no single procedural variable or combination of variables appears to be clearly linked to the occurrence of a choose-short or a choose-long bias during delay testing in rats.…”
Section: Memory For Temporal Durationsmentioning
confidence: 99%