2011
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq1268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RATT: Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool

Abstract: Second-generation sequencing technologies have made large-scale sequencing projects commonplace. However, making use of these datasets often requires gene function to be ascribed genome wide. Although tool development has kept pace with the changes in sequence production, for tasks such as mapping, de novo assembly or visualization, genome annotation remains a challenge. We have developed a method to rapidly provide accurate annotation for new genomes using previously annotated genomes as a reference. The meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
253
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
253
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the close proximity to the KSHV reference sequence, the annotation of each new genome was carried out by transferring the available KHSV annotation in GenBank using RATT (26). However, splicing junctions were unsuccessfully transferred for the K8 and K15 genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the close proximity to the KSHV reference sequence, the annotation of each new genome was carried out by transferring the available KHSV annotation in GenBank using RATT (26). However, splicing junctions were unsuccessfully transferred for the K8 and K15 genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome annotation was transferred from the Lu strain to the newly sequenced MYXV genomes using the Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool (16). EMBL flat files of transferred gene models were then inspected and compared to Lu using the Artemis comparison tool (17); incorrect models were corrected, and new gene models were added where transfer had not occurred.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome annotation was transferred from Lu to MSW by use of the Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool (18) and from previous genome mapping of the partial sequence of MSW (16). EMBL flat files of transferred gene models were then inspected and compared to the Lu reference by using the Artemis comparison tool (19); models were corrected, and new gene models were added where transfer had not occurred.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%