2022
DOI: 10.1399/nul.2022.04.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raumanalyse der ackerbaulichen Flächennutzung in Naturschutz- und FFH-Gebieten in Deutschland - Ein Beitrag zur Minderung von Biodiversitätsschäden in Schutzgebieten

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the Digital Land Cover Model Germany (LBM-DE) 2018 of the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (BKG), we extracted the amount of area in agricultural production and nature reserves in the surrounding of the 21 selected conservation areas, the German category of nature-protected areas (NSG) and the protected areas under the FFH directive of the EU (Eichler et al 2022) (Online Resource 2, Landscape analysis). To obtain information on the proportion of the agricultural production area and nature conserved area within a radius of 500-3500 m, the transect consisting of traps 1 to 5 was buffered by 500 m, 1000 m, 1500 m, 2000 m, 2500 m, 3000 m, and 3500 m respectively.…”
Section: Landscape Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the Digital Land Cover Model Germany (LBM-DE) 2018 of the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (BKG), we extracted the amount of area in agricultural production and nature reserves in the surrounding of the 21 selected conservation areas, the German category of nature-protected areas (NSG) and the protected areas under the FFH directive of the EU (Eichler et al 2022) (Online Resource 2, Landscape analysis). To obtain information on the proportion of the agricultural production area and nature conserved area within a radius of 500-3500 m, the transect consisting of traps 1 to 5 was buffered by 500 m, 1000 m, 1500 m, 2000 m, 2500 m, 3000 m, and 3500 m respectively.…”
Section: Landscape Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable an evidence-based optimisation of protected area management, we assess species composition at selected sites, unprecedented in its completeness for flying insects due to the use of DNA metabarcoding and relate it to floral (Swenson et al 2022) and spatial characteristics of the nature reserves and potential pesticide residues. By drawing on a complete set of biodiversity monitoring data, ecotoxicology data (Brühl et al 2021) as well as spatial data on agricultural land-use (Eichler et al 2022), this study presents a comprehensive analysis of impacts on insect biodiversity in nature reserves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similarly dramatic situation is evident for the threat to wildlife in these arable habitats. With agricultural use as a major cause of insect decline (Sánchez-Bayo & Wyckhuys, 2019), NPA and special areas of conservation (SAC) of the European Natura 2000 network are becoming increasingly important for the conservation of biodiversity, including arable habitats (Eichler et al, 2022; Sorg et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DINA project (Diversity of Insects in Nature protected Areas), a comprehensive interdisciplinary research project involving eight institutions (Lehmann et al, 2021), investigates the influence on insect populations in nature reserves as part of SAC and within the European Natura 2000 network (Brühl et al, 2021; Eichler et al, 2022; Köthe et al, 2023a; Lehmann et al, 2021; Swenson et al, 2022). Based on the original model to study the main drivers for the decline in insect biomass (Hallmann et al 2017), we focused on the already identified covariates: the influence of arable land and the chemical inputs such as nitrogen and pesticides associated with intensive land use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation