“…The 1D-NMR spectra (Tables 1 and 3 ) revealed the presence of an unsubstituted indole moiety [ δ H 7.38 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.26 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.02 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 7.3 Hz), and 6.95 (1H, dd, J = 7.8, 7.3, Hz); δ C 139.7 (s), 138.2 (s), 128.9 (s), 121.9 (d), 119.7 (d), 118.5 (d), 111.9 (d), and 104.0 (s)], an ethylidene group [ δ H 1.75 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz) and 5.93 (1H, q, J = 6.9 Hz); δ C 14.3 (q) and 125.2 (d)], and a glucose unit [ δ H 4.64 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 3.29 (1H, m), 3.37 (1H, m), 3.28 (2H, m), 3.60 (1H, dd, J = 11.9, 4.9 Hz), and 3.74 (1H, dd, J = 11.9, 1.6 Hz); δ C 103.2 (d), 78.0 (d), 77.9 (d), 75.4 (d), 71.4 (d), and 62.7 (t)]. Comparison of its 13 C NMR data with those of rauvotetraphylline B [ 6 ] revealed a remarkable resemblance except for a prominent difference as follows: the carbon signals assigned to 4,6-dimethylpyrid-2-yl unit in rauvotetraphylline B were not present, and there was a set of newly arisen resonances [ δ C 56.5 (d), 47.4 (t), 213.2 (s), 55.7 (t), 55.5 (s), 25.6 (q), and 31.9 (q)] determined as a 2,2-dimethyl-4-oxopiperidin-6-yl moiety by HMBC correlations (Fig. 1 ) from H-17 to C-23, H-22 to C-23 and C-24, and H-24 to C-22, C-23, C-25, C-26, and C-27.…”