1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00845124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raw versus relative scores in the assessment of coping strategies

Abstract: Raw scores (frequency of efforts) versus relative scores (percentage of efforts) were compared on the five scales of the revised Ways of Coping Checklist. It was hypothesized that, conditional on the source of and appraisal of a stressor, problem-focused coping should be inversely related and Wishful Thinking should be positively related to depression when relative scores were used but that raw problem-focused scores would be less clearly related to depression in such a way. It was further hypothesized that th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
216
2
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
216
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative scores for the 8 WCCL-R subscales are reported in Table 2. As suggested by Vitaliano et a1 (36), relative scores were calculated by dividing the raw score for each subscale by the total raw score of all 8 subscales. Relative scores are thus percentages, and represent the emphasis placed on a particular type of coping relative to the other 7 types, rather than absolute amount of coping reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative scores for the 8 WCCL-R subscales are reported in Table 2. As suggested by Vitaliano et a1 (36), relative scores were calculated by dividing the raw score for each subscale by the total raw score of all 8 subscales. Relative scores are thus percentages, and represent the emphasis placed on a particular type of coping relative to the other 7 types, rather than absolute amount of coping reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses are made on a 4-point Likert scale, from 0=does not apply/not used to 3=used a great deal. The established procedure 22 for converting raw scores to relative scores was used to control for the unequal number of items within the scales. This involved calculating the mean item score for each scale and dividing by the number of items in that scale, summing these averages, and dividing the average of each scale by the sum of the averages for all eight scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20) The items that comprise the JCS coping styles (21) The relative score was obtained by adding up the number of items marked with an "x", divided by the number of items contained in the subscale, called the middle score, and then dividing the middle score of each subscale by the sum of the total middle scores. (20,24) The highest score among the relative scores is considered the most used coping style for dealing with stressors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%