1981
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1981.1142682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ray analysis of mutual coupling between antennas on a convex surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, we use the method of Hill et al (1994) [1], viewing the aircraft cabin as a reverberant microwave cavity in which only four loss mechanisms are possible: (1) loss due to escape from the cavity, (2) loss due to absorption by lossy media, (3) loss due to finite wall conductivity, and (4) loss due to intercept by other antennas. We assume that the loss due to mechanisms (3) and (4) is insignificant compared to the first two mechanisms, and we further assume that transmission through windows is the dominant contribution to (1). Under these assumptions, the ratio of power escaping the cabin (through windows) to total power transmit is L w ≈ Q 2 /(Q 2 + Q 3 ) where Q 2 and Q 3 are "quality factors" associated with absorption and escape loss, respectively, obtained from expressions in [1].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this, we use the method of Hill et al (1994) [1], viewing the aircraft cabin as a reverberant microwave cavity in which only four loss mechanisms are possible: (1) loss due to escape from the cavity, (2) loss due to absorption by lossy media, (3) loss due to finite wall conductivity, and (4) loss due to intercept by other antennas. We assume that the loss due to mechanisms (3) and (4) is insignificant compared to the first two mechanisms, and we further assume that transmission through windows is the dominant contribution to (1). Under these assumptions, the ratio of power escaping the cabin (through windows) to total power transmit is L w ≈ Q 2 /(Q 2 + Q 3 ) where Q 2 and Q 3 are "quality factors" associated with absorption and escape loss, respectively, obtained from expressions in [1].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumes that the power is equally divided across both polarizations, again justified due to the copious scattering within the cabin. The electric field due to any one current moment at any other point on the fuselage can be found using the UTD convex surface "creeping wave" formulation given in [3]. Assuming the associated geodesic ray paths are unobstructed by wings and other discontinuities, the total field at any given point on the fuselage is obtained simply by repeating this procedure for each current moment and summing the results, yielding the total electric field E r .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rigorous method to evaluate the mutual coupling is adapted from [23,25] and it is based on the Uniform Theory of Diffraction, [23,26,27] due to the curved conducting surface.…”
Section: Mutual Coupling Of Slots On a Paraboloidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the T coefficients are given in [26]. The off-diagonal elements of the T matrix are much smaller than the diagonal ones i.e.,…”
Section: Mutual Coupling Of Slots On a Paraboloidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of an asymptotic second-kind electric DGF circumvents the problems inherent in an exact formulation that were discussed previously. As mentioned previously, the asymptotic DGF is derived within the context of a uniform theory of diffraction (UTD) formalism developed by Pathak and Kouyoumjian [11]. In order to derive the asymptotic DGF, a closed-form expression for tracing geodesic paths on prolate spheroids is needed.…”
Section: Fe-bi Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%