Rayyan for systematic reviews

Johnson, Nastasha; Phillips, Margaret

doi:10.1080/1941126x.2018.1444339

Cited by 115 publications

(72 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The records were exported to Rayyan [20] for independent blinded eligibility screening by three reviewers (EB, AU, and TE). Duplicate records were identified and manually removed.…”

Section: Data Management and Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of COVID-19 and the Pandemic on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review

Beukes

Ulep

Eubank

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review aimed to systematically review what has been published regarding tinnitus during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic up to March 2021 by performing both narrative and quantitative meta-analyses. Of the 181 records identified, 33 met the inclusion criteria, which generally had a fair risk of overall bias. In the included, 28 studies focused on the impact of the COVID-19 virus on tinnitus and 5 studies focused on the impact of the pandemic on tinnitus. From the studies identifying the impact of COVID-19 on tinnitus, there were 17 cross-sectional studies (n = 8913) and 11 case series or case report studies (n = 35). There were 2 cross-sectional studies (n = 3232) and 3 pre-post-test design studies (n = 326) focusing on the impact of the pandemic on tinnitus. No consistent patterns were found regarding the presentation of the tinnitus or additional factors that could have tinnitus developing in the disease impact studies. For the pandemic impact studies, the associated stress and anxiety of the pandemic were consistently suggested to contribute to tinnitus experiences. The pooled estimated prevalence of tinnitus post COVID-19 was 8% (CI: 5 to 13%). Medical professionals should be aware that tinnitus might be more problematic following the pandemic or after having COVID-19.

show abstract

“…The records were exported to Rayyan [20] for independent blinded eligibility screening by three reviewers (EB, AU, and TE). Duplicate records were identified and manually removed.…”

Section: Data Management and Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of COVID-19 and the Pandemic on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review

Beukes

Ulep

Eubank

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The selection of studies will take place in two phases. All records resulting from crossing descriptors and keywords will be identified, being included in the EndNote Web software 27 . Duplicate records will be counted only once and those that do not meet the eligibility criteria will be excluded.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Humor as focus of nursing diagnosis: A scoping review protocol.

Silva¹,

Assunção²,

Marques-Vieira³

et al. 2021

iNJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Humour being a widely studied concept, still hasn’t reach consensus in the scientific community. Analysing this concept becomes paramount for a subsequent inclusion in the Nursing Process, competing to improve the quality of care provided. Objectives: To develop a range analysis protocol proposing the mapping of the studies conducted in the context of humor in the field of health care. Methods: This protocol has been structured according to the methodology defined by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). For the construction of the research guiding question, the PCC strategy was adopted: adult people (Population), concept of humor (Concept), health care (Context). The sample will consist of studies that address any of the characteristics inherent in humor, understood as antecedents, attributes, and consequences, regardless of the health context in which they are developed. This research will not be limited in temporal or linguistic terms. Considerable research in online databases (7) will be integrated by bibliographical research. We will also use databases for research grey literature as well consulting aspects in the field of humor to collaborate in the research. Results: The data will be presented in tabular and narrative form. Conclusion: The protocol development allows an understanding of the humor concept in health care, however it is a scoping review which provide a breath but not deep knowledge about humor as topic. Despite this, it is suitable for the definition of a nursing diagnosis.

show abstract

“…Rayyan è un software progettato e realizzato dalla fondazione Quatar Computing Research Institute e si configura come strumento completamente gratuito (Johnson & Phillips, 2018). È stato concepito con lo scopo di sostenere i ricercatori nei primi passaggi di una SR, con particolare attenzione alla fase di T&AbScreen.…”

Section: Rayyanunclassified

Evaluating software tools to conduct systematic reviews: a feature analysis and user survey

Pellegrini

Marsili

2021

Form@re

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systematic reviews are research synthesis methods increasingly used in educational research to support evidence-based decision making. The conduction of a systematic review is a complex process with several phases usually supported by software tools. These tools used at the international level are not currently common in the Italian educational research. This work describes four software tools used in the international educational research and evaluates their general functionality and specific features’ usability to conduct the systematic review phases of study screening and selection. For this purpose, this study uses two methods: a feature analysis (Kitchenham et al., 1997) and an expert survey (Harrison et al., 2020). The results of both investigation methods agree to consider Covidence and Rayyan the most functional software tools in conducting SR. Among the four tools, ASReview has the greatest potential for making the process of a SR more efficient. Una valutazione dei software per condurre revisioni sistematiche: analisi delle caratteristiche e sondaggio a esperti Le revisioni sistematiche sono metodi di sintesi di ricerca sempre più utilizzati in campo educativo al fine di supportare il processo decisionale basato su evidenze. La conduzione di una revisione sistematica, poiché complessa e su più fasi, è sovente supportata in ambito internazionale da software specifici attualmente poco diffusi nella ricerca educativa italiana. Il contributo presenta quattro software utilizzati nella ricerca educativa internazionale e valuta le funzionalità generali e l’usabilità di caratteristiche specifiche per condurre le fasi di screening e di selezione degli studi. A questo scopo lo studio impiega i metodi dell’analisi delle caratteristiche (Kitchenham et al., 1997) e del sondaggio ad esperti in revisioni sistematiche (Harrison et al., 2020) in campo educativo. I risultati di entrambi i metodi di indagine concordano nel ritenere Covidence e Rayyan gli strumenti più funzionali per condurre revisioni sistematiche, mentre ASReview risulta il software con maggiore potenzialità per rendere il processo più efficiente.

show abstract

Rayyan for systematic reviews

Cited by 115 publications

References 0 publications

The Impact of COVID-19 and the Pandemic on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review

The Impact of COVID-19 and the Pandemic on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review

Humor as focus of nursing diagnosis: A scoping review protocol.

Evaluating software tools to conduct systematic reviews: a feature analysis and user survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About