RBCS1 expression in coffee: Coffea orthologs, Coffea arabica homeologs, and expression variability between genotypes and under drought stress

Abstract

BackgroundIn higher plants, the inhibition of photosynthetic capacity under drought is attributable to stomatal and non-stomatal (i.e., photochemical and biochemical) effects. In particular, a disruption of photosynthetic metabolism and Rubisco regulation can be observed. Several studies reported reduced expression of the RBCS genes, which encode the Rubisco small subunit, under water stress.ResultsExpression of the RBCS1 gene was analysed in the allopolyploid context of C. arabica, which originates from a natural cross between the C. canephora and C. eugenioides species. Our study revealed the existence of two homeologous RBCS1 genes in C. arabica: one carried by the C. canephora sub-genome (called CaCc) and the other carried by the C. eugenioides sub-genome (called CaCe). Using specific primer pairs for each homeolog, expression studies revealed that CaCe was expressed in C. eugenioides and C. arabica but was undetectable in C. canephora. On the other hand, CaCc was expressed in C. canephora but almost completely silenced in non-introgressed ("pure") genotypes of C. arabica. However, enhanced CaCc expression was observed in most C. arabica cultivars with introgressed C. canephora genome. In addition, total RBCS1 expression was higher for C. arabica cultivars that had recently introgressed C. canephora genome than for "pure" cultivars. For both species, water stress led to an important decrease in the abundance of RBCS1 transcripts. This was observed for plants grown in either greenhouse or field conditions under severe or moderate drought. However, this reduction of RBCS1 gene expression was not accompanied by a decrease in the corresponding protein in the leaves of C. canephora subjected to water withdrawal. In that case, the amount of RBCS1 was even higher under drought than under unstressed (irrigated) conditions, which suggests great stability of RBCS1 under adverse water conditions. On the other hand, for C. arabica, high nocturnal expression of RBCS1 could also explain the accumulation of the RBCS1 protein under water stress. Altogether, the results presented here suggest that the content of RBCS was not responsible for the loss of photosynthetic capacity that is commonly observed in water-stressed coffee plants.ConclusionWe showed that the CaCe homeolog was expressed in C. eugenioides and non-introgressed ("pure") genotypes of C. arabica but that it was undetectable in C. canephora. On the other hand, the CaCc homeolog was expressed in C. canephora but highly repressed in C. arabica. Expression of the CaCc homeolog was enhanced in C. arabica cultivars that experienced recent introgression with C. canephora. For both C. canephora and C. arabica species, total RBCS1 gene expression was highly reduced with WS. Unexpectedly, the accumulation of RBCS1 protein was observed in the leaves of C. canephora under WS, possibly coming from nocturnal RBCS1 expression. These results suggest that the increase in the amount of RBCS1 protein could contribute to the antioxidative function of photorespiration in water-stres...

Next generation variety development for sustainable production of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.): a review

“…However, C. arabica lacks the basic physiological characteristics of veritable DT plant species and more severe conditions of water (and high temperature) stress will unavoidably affect productivity and quality (DaMatta 2004;2006). Marraccini et al (2011;2012) have provided interesting scientific evidence of the molecular mechanisms of plant responses to drought stress in coffee, but do not relate this to mature coffee trees in regard to yield and beverage quality. Instead, adapting the ecosystem to the physiological requirements of the coffee plant, f.i.…”

Somatic Embryogenesis in Coffea spp.

“…The cloning of genes involved in the SE process, with the goal of increasing the efficiency of the process (Arroyo-Herrera et al 2008), and the production of plants with resistance to different kind of stresses (Leroy et al 1999(Leroy et al , 2000Perthuis et al 2005). During the last years our knowledge on coffee pests and disease resistance genes (Lashermes et al 2010;Noir et al 2003;Ribas et al 2011b), drought resistance genes (Marraccini et al 2011), and specific promoters (Marraccini et al 1999;Petitot et al 2013) has made possible to target specific genes to improve Coffea spp.…”

Arabidopsisscaffold protein RACK1A interacts with diverse environmental stress and photosynthesis related proteins

“…The putative interaction of RACK1A with Rubisco subunits suggests a role for RACK1A in photorespiration, thus indirectly implicated in the drought response. It is possible that inactivation of RACK1A may provide plant with avenues to channel its excess absorbed energy during drought/high light stress condition by channeling the excess energy load toward the photorespiration pathway 4 , 17 . On the other hand, ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase (Fd-GOGAT) also plays a major role in photorespiration in Arabidopsis 18 .…”