2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95957-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RBF Neural Network Adaptive Sliding Mode Control of Rotary Stewart Platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, θM=[θM1θM2θM3centerθM4θM5θM6]T represents the motor angular depicted in Figure 1(a). To reveal the connection between L i and θMi, the results of the same model in Tajdari et al (2020a) are extracted from Van Nguyen and Ha (2018); Szufnarowski (2013); thenwhere scriptAi,scriptBi,scriptCiU(trueX¯) andwhere θ h defines the angle between truePi and X in the XYZ axis, and β is the motor installation angle to the horizon. The defined formula in (2) explains that measuring the X¯ via a sensor mounted on the end-effector results in determining the corresponding operating angle value of each motor, which is useful to practically implement position controller approaches on such robots.
Figure 1.The Stewart platform mechanism: (a) defined variables and vectors and (b) the top view of the...
…”
Section: Equation Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, θM=[θM1θM2θM3centerθM4θM5θM6]T represents the motor angular depicted in Figure 1(a). To reveal the connection between L i and θMi, the results of the same model in Tajdari et al (2020a) are extracted from Van Nguyen and Ha (2018); Szufnarowski (2013); thenwhere scriptAi,scriptBi,scriptCiU(trueX¯) andwhere θ h defines the angle between truePi and X in the XYZ axis, and β is the motor installation angle to the horizon. The defined formula in (2) explains that measuring the X¯ via a sensor mounted on the end-effector results in determining the corresponding operating angle value of each motor, which is useful to practically implement position controller approaches on such robots.
Figure 1.The Stewart platform mechanism: (a) defined variables and vectors and (b) the top view of the...
…”
Section: Equation Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, employing the Newton–Euler method, the dynamic formulation of the Stewart platform equipped with six rotary motors is concluded from Van Nguyen and Ha (2018); Szufnarowski (2013). The platform includes, as shown in Figure 1, a moving plate as the end-effector, a sedentary plate as the base, six rotary actuators as manipulators to move the end-effector, and six legs connected to their corresponded motors.…”
Section: Equation Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, it can avoid unnecessary and lengthy calculation compared with the traditional BP neural network. It is proved by numerous literatures that RBF neural networks can approximate any nonlinear function in a compact set [41]. In order to obtain the estimate of the φ, the RBF neural network is utilized to approximate the real value.…”
Section: Rbf Neural Network-based Robustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinematics of the robot with linear manipulator was widely studied in recent years, namely Geng et al (1992); Petrescu et al (2018); and Tajdari et al (2020c), whereas mechanisms with rotary actuators are less studied due to additional complexity of rotation. Thus, in this article, a Stewart robot with rotary manipulator is investigated, owing to the fact that it is faster than a Stewart platform with linear actuators in control responses (Van Nguyen and Ha, 2018). Also, it has less production and maintenance cost, less weight, easier installation procedure (e.g., surgical goals), and powerful ability of integration with other mechanisms (Patel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%