1991
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1991)117:11(3417)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RC Beams Strengthened with GFRP Plates. I: Experimental Study

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The static strength of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by gluing glass-fiber-reinforced-plastic (GFRP) plates to their tension flanges is experimentally investigated. Five rectangular beams and one T-beam were tested to failure under four-point bending. The measured load versus strain in GFRP plate, steel rebar, extreme compression fiber of concrete, and the load versus deflection for the section at midspan of the beams are plotted and compared to the predicted values. The results indicate that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
146
0
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 501 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
146
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending the CFRP composite to cover the entire hogging zone, such as in beams E2, E4 and E5, or the entire sagging zone, such as in beams E3 and E4, did not prevent brittle separation of the CFRP laminates. The peeling failure, which occurred for the continuous beam tested in this experimental investigation is similar to that observed for simply supported beams tested elsewhere 1,3,5,6 . Table 4 summarises the total failure load P t (the sum of the two mid-span point loads) and 8 the ultimate load enhancement ratio () which is the ratio of the ultimate load of an externally strengthened beam to that of the control beam.…”
Section: Modes and Loads Of Failuresupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extending the CFRP composite to cover the entire hogging zone, such as in beams E2, E4 and E5, or the entire sagging zone, such as in beams E3 and E4, did not prevent brittle separation of the CFRP laminates. The peeling failure, which occurred for the continuous beam tested in this experimental investigation is similar to that observed for simply supported beams tested elsewhere 1,3,5,6 . Table 4 summarises the total failure load P t (the sum of the two mid-span point loads) and 8 the ultimate load enhancement ratio () which is the ratio of the ultimate load of an externally strengthened beam to that of the control beam.…”
Section: Modes and Loads Of Failuresupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Although several research studies have been conducted on the strengthening and repair of simply supported reinforced concrete beams using external plates [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] , there is little reported work on the behaviour of strengthened continuous beams [8][9][10] . The authors 8 previously tested a series of two span reinforced concrete beams with external CFRP sheets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the tensile force per unit width in the FRP sheet, T u , depends on the compressive strength of concrete, f' c , and the effective bond length L e . (42) when the stiffness of the strengthened concrete element is much higher than the FRP stiffness, L e is defined as: G a and G c are the shear modulus of the resin and concrete. Poisson ratios for concrete and resin are taken as 0.50 and 0.38 respectively for the case where the concrete is in the plastic range as explained in [30].…”
Section: Wu and Niu Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the effect of various CFRP types (strips and sheet) and shear reinforcement configurations on the shear behaviour of the beam. 4. To study the bond mechanism between the CFRP laminates and the concrete surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%